Would On Her Majesty's Secret Service be the Best Bond Film Featuring Sean Connery?

Sean Connery

Connery's list of best films is often considered to include many iconic roles that have stood the test of time. However, when it comes to evaluating On Her Majesty's Secret Service (OHMSS) and Sean Connery's contribution, opinions vary widely. Some argue that without Connery, OHMSS would not have achieved the acclaim it has, while others contend that it is already an outstanding Bond film on its own.

OHMSS and Sean Connery's Legacy

One cannot deny Sean Connery's exceptional talent, and his portrayal of 007 has undoubtedly been a crucial factor in the Bond franchise's enduring success. Connery brings a depth and authenticity to the role that is difficult to match. However, it is essential to consider that many people believe OHMSS stands out even without Connery's involvement. Some argue that Roger Lazenby's performance in On Her MAJESTY's Secret Service (OHMSS) is spot-on, allowing Bond to be more human and vulnerable.

The Context of Bond's Arc

OHMSS (On Her Majesty's Secret Service) is notable for its place in the series, reflecting an earlier phase in Bond's career. The film's narrative aligns with a more realistic timeframe, as early Bond films, such as From Russia With Love (1963), had issues with continuity, where SPECTRE knew Bond's identity and appearance from the start. Consequently, OHMSS needs to precede From Russia With Love to maintain a more plausible storyline. Furthermore, by this time in Connery's career, he had grown disenchanted with the role, evident in his lackluster performance in the subsequent film, Diamonds Are Forever (1971), which is widely regarded as one of the worst Bond films ever made.

Redefined Evaluations Over the Years

OHMSS has undergone a re-evaluation in recent decades, providing a new perspective on the film. It is now recognized as one of the best Bond films in the series. Roger Moore's portrayal in The Spider's Web (Live and Let Die 1973) is often credited with making Connery's performance in OHMSS more commendable. More significantly, No Time to Die (2021), directed by Cary Joji Fukunaga and starring Daniel Craig, has nodding homage to OHMSS, reflecting its significance in the Bond legacy.

It is paramount to acknowledge that OHMSS would not have been better with Connery in the role; rather, it would have been significantly worse. Had Sean Connery returned for OHMSS, his disinterest and declining enthusiasm might have hindered the film's quality. Similarly, replacing Roger Lazenby with Timothy Dalton or even Sean Connery for Diamonds Are Forever would have resulted in a considerably worse film, jeopardizing the franchise's trajectory and potential re-evaluation of OHMSS.

Lastly, the transition from Lazenby to Moore with Live and Let Die was essential for Moore's performance and reception. If Moore had started with OHMSS, it could have profoundly affected his career and the overall Bond experience.

Overall, OHMSS remains a remarkable entry in the Bond series, establishing a unique and memorable phase in the character's evolution. Its enduring influence in the franchise can only be appreciated more with time. Whether Connery or Lazenby, the essence of the film lies in its storytelling and the performances it offers.