Why the Question of Russian Collusion with Trump Still Persists

The ongoing debate regarding Russian collusion with the Trump campaign during the 2016 U.S. presidential election continues to captivate public and political discourse. Critics argue that despite initial efforts to dismiss the claim, evidence strongly suggests a connection between Russia and the Trump administration.

The Acting Role of Russian Puppets in Politics

With Trump pursueing a presidential bid, the urgency to dispel notions of Russian manipulation becomes paramount. The mere suggestion of a Russian puppet as a future president raises significant concerns about foreign influence in domestic affairs. The Republican party, in their resilience to maintain this narrative, have rallied behind the Durham report to either support or undermine this perception.

FBI and the Durham Report: A Limited Investigation

The Durham report, much anticipated, paints a picture where the FBI's investigation was indeed sloppy but could not hide the need to delve deeper. While the report may not conclusively prove collusion, it does highlight the interconnectivity between Russian actions and key events during the 2016 election. The findings suggest that there is a substantial case to be made for a need to explore further the role of Russian interference.

Adam Schiff and the Fake Investigation

Adam Schiff, a prominent Democrat, was censured for his role in conducting the so-called "fake collusion investigation." His actions, although intended to investigate potential malfeasance, appear to have been more politically motivated than fact-based. The irony of his censure highlights the dissonance in the ongoing narrative. The Durham report ironically exonerated Trump, while casting suspicion on Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee (DNC).

Collusion Allegations in the Mueller Report

Despite Robert Mueller's conclusion that there was insufficient evidence to charge Trump with collusion, the Mueller report provides a detailed account of Russian actions and their impact on the Trump administration. The report meticulously outlines the connections and links between Russian activities and Trump's team. Donald Trump's history of questionable decisions and actions makes it difficult to believe that he was not complicit, especially when he openly sought Russian assistance by asking for the release of Hillary Clinton's emails.

The Shallow Durham Report and Republican Motivations

The Durham report, while underselling the severity of Russian interference, is being used by some Republicans to whitewash the issue. The Republican Senate Oversight report, however, provides a more substantive investigation that took three years, offering a clearer picture of the events and their implications.

The First in History: Russian Collusion

Never before has a U.S. presidential candidate attempted to collude with a foreign power in order to gain the presidency. This alone is a historic and concerning precedence. The responsibility to hold Trump accountable for this unprecedented act remains crucial.

Conclusion

The question of Russian collusion with Trump remains a contentious issue not merely due to the media's portrayal but also because of the actions of the Trumpist Republican base. Efforts to whitewash the issue with the Durham report overshadow the more comprehensive investigations conducted by the Senate. The truth is, the 2016 election, with its many irregularities and interconnectivities, demands thorough and unbiased scrutiny.