Why is the Justice Department Suing Google for Antitrust Violations?

The U.S. Justice Department is currently suing Google for various anti-competitive practices, including its agreements with the Android operating system and its default applications. This move has sparked widespread discussion about the motivations behind the litigation.

Motives and Political Influence

Some argue that the current administration's motivations go beyond simple antitrust enforcement. The U.S. Justice Department is largely controlled politically, and having control over a giant like Google could be advantageous. The current political landscape is dominated by the left, which may see this move as a way to exert influence over one of the most powerful companies in the tech industry.

Others point to Google's own actions. Dr. Robert Epstein, in his research, has documented how Google's algorithms favor liberals. This not only raises ethical concerns but also suggests that the company has significant political influence. Epstein's studies have indicated that Google has even deliberately biased election results, particularly in national elections, potentially shifting votes by up to 10% in favor of the Democrats.

Antitrust Violations and Unethical Practices

Google's actions go beyond just political influence. It has gobbled up a number of other search engines, consolidating its market share and stifling competition. This has clearly put Google in violation of antitrust laws. Additionally, the company's practices are unethical and partisan, favoring specific political ideologies and potentially affecting election outcomes for profit.

National Security Concerns and Monopoly Control

The Justice Department's concerns extend beyond just antitrust violations to include national security. Google's near-monopoly over internet information could be seen as a threat to the national security of the United States. As internet data becomes increasingly vital for modern governance and communication, a single entity controlling such a large portion of it is concerning. Access to information is not just a matter of convenience but a matter of both individual rights and national security.

Furthermore, Google's practices of censoring information are seen as a violation of the original intention of the internet; to freely share and access information across the globe without such controls. This censorship for profit goes against the spirit of the internet and serves to create monopolistic control over information.

Conclusion and the Need for Change

In light of these issues, there is a growing consensus that Google needs to be broken up into smaller entities. This would not only reduce the company's market power but also help to restore competition, ensuring that the internet remains a free and open platform for all. The current situation is not only a matter of corporate governance but also a matter of public policy and national security.

By addressing these concerns, the U.S. can help ensure that the internet remains a tool for freedom and democracy, rather than a instrument of corporate control and political manipulation.