Why The Shining Book Surpasses the Movie
Why The Shining Book Surpasses the Movie
Often the conversation around The Shining revolves around the notion that one version is superior to the other. However, there is a strong argument to be made that the novel is better than the film, particularly in terms of storytelling, depth, and audience engagement.
Storytelling and Depth
The novel, written by Stephen King, presents a straightforward and unambiguous narrative filled with supernatural elements. Jack Torrance, the protagonist, undergoes a transformation from a flawed but fundamentally decent family man into a homicidal monster. This transition, driven by the influence of the Overlook Hotel's malevolent spirits, is intricately detailed and leaves a profound impact on the reader. The supernatural entities represented as ghosts and spirits in the novel play a pivotal role in unraveling the psychological and emotional complexities of the story. In contrast, Stanley Kubrick's adaptation of the novel into the film The Shining dilutes some of these elements, opting for a more ambiguous and surreal approach to horror.
Stanley Kubrick's Interpretation
Kubrick's film, while renowned for its artistic and cinematic brilliance, deviates significantly from the original novel. The underlying theme of supernatural horror is toned down in favor of a more ambiguous and atmospheric experience. The characters and events in the film are presented through a shroud of mystery, with the viewer never fully certain of the veracity of the events. For instance, the presence of ghosts and spirits in the Overlook Hotel is called into question in the film. Jack Nicholson's portrayal of Jack Torrance adds an element of uncertainty, suggesting that the character's descent into madness might be a product of his own delusions or past traumas. This ambiguity is a striking departure from the clear-cut supernatural narrative of the novel.
Stephen King’s Perspective
Stephen King, the author, was famously dissatisfied with Kubrick's adaptation. He believed that Kubrick's handling of the story did not do justice to the depth and intensity he intended. King emphasized the importance of books and their unique ability to engage readers on a literary level, which is often lost in film adaptations. In a book, the reader can fully immerse themselves in the narrative, exploring the intricate details and multiple layers of the story. The novel allows for a personal connection with the characters and the overarching themes, making the experience more enriching and thought-provoking.
Frank Darabont's Adaptation
One notable exception to the criticism of film adaptations is the TV miniseries The Shining directed by Frank Darabont. Darabont managed to capture many of the nuances and complexities of King's novel, albeit with some necessary changes. The 1997 miniseries, starring Barry Pepper as Jack Torrance, maintained the novel's focus on the supernatural and psychological horror, while still providing a cinematic experience that honored King's original vision. The casting of actors like Pepper and Cole Hauser, who played Danny Torrance, added depth and authenticity to the roles, making the character development more compelling.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while both the novel and the film versions of The Shining are highly regarded, the book stands out as a more comprehensive and deeply engaging work. The novel's intricate narrative, rich character development, and supernatural elements offer a far richer and more immersive experience than the film adaptation. For those seeking a more profound and thought-provoking journey into the depths of human psyche and the supernatural, King's novel remains the superior choice.