Why Some Bollywood Actors Get More Opportunities Than Others: Vikram, Vijay, Ajith, and Suriya

Introduction

The Tamil movie industry, like other Indian film industries, has a unique dynamic where certain actors seem to attract more projects and opportunities than others, despite possessing comparable or even superior talent. This article delves into why some actors, such as Vijay, Ajith, and Suriya, often get a larger share of the limelight compared to other talented actors, like Vikram, who can deliver powerful performances but are not as frequently given leading roles. Understanding these factors can provide insights into the complex world of Indian cinema and the criteria that studios, producers, and distributors consider when selecting actors for films.

Vikram: A Talented Actor with Limited Opportunities

Beginning his career in 1990, Vikram has been a professional actor for over three decades, starring in approximately 55 feature films. Despite his exceptional talent, he has not always been provided with equal opportunities. The reasons for this variance are multifaceted, including early career challenges, financial constraints, and stiff competition from more established stars.

Early Career and Challenges

Upon making his debut in the Tamil film 'En Kadhal Kanmani' in 1990, Vikram faced a series of challenges. Out of his 15 films in 1990, only 4 passed the 'average hit' or 'hit' category, with the majority being flops. One notable failure was 'Ullasam' where he starred alongside Ajith and Maheshwari, which, although not a total disaster, did not mark him as a standout performer of the industry. This experience, along with the flop of 'Vellai Kotigal' and 'Thiruvizha', perhaps made him understand the importance of finding the right project to establish his name in the industry.

Struggles and Strides

The early years of Vikram's career were marked by a series of challenges. Finances often drove him towards taking roles in less promising productions, like Telugu and Malayalam films, where he had minor success due to commercial failures. For instance, in his Telugu debut 'Chudamani Shreeram', the film flopped, despite his performances, which was a substantial blow to his confidence and career.

In 1993, Vikram had an opportunity to work with the renowned director Mani Ratnam in 'Bombay', alongside Manisha Koirala. However, a simple appearance on a beard required by the role prevented him from taking the project, leading to a missed opportunity to work with a key director. This incident highlighted the sometimes arbitrary nature of the film industry.

Personal Struggles and Career Perseverance

Personal struggles also played a role in Vikram's journey. He declined supporting roles to gain breakthrough roles as a lead actor, and he even refused to dub for other heroes in films to ensure he had enough autonomy in choosing his projects. His dedication to his craft is evident in his personal efforts to transform physically for roles, such as for 'Sethu', where he shaved his head, grew his nails, and lost a significant amount of weight. These rigorous preparations contributed to his growth as an actor but did not necessarily translate into immediate success or sustenance.

Support and Networking

Often, networking and support from colleagues and family members can provide actors with the initial push they need. However, Vikram's family did not have a strong presence in the industry to offer him the necessary support. His father, being a failed actor, and his relatives being involved in the production business did not provide him with the same network that some other actors might enjoy. This lack of support likely contributed to a slower build-up of his career as a leading actor.

Comparative Analysis: Vijay, Ajith, and Suriya

Comparing Vikram to actors like Vijay, Ajith, and Suriya, who have managed to secure more leading roles, reveals several key differences in their career trajectories.

Vijay: The High-Paid Star

Starting his career as a child artist in 1984, Vijay has since become one of the highest-paid actors in India. With around 67 lead roles, he has proven his commercial viability and appeal to audiences. Films like 'Ghilie', 'Tirumalai', and 'Bagavathi' have drawn significant crowds. Although some of his films have received mixed reviews, his overall commercial success and star value make him a preferred choice for producers.

Ajith Kumar: The Romantically Popular Idol

Beginning his career as a small role in En Veedu En Kanavar in 1990, Ajith has consistently maintained a strong fan base. From romantic roles like Kadhal Kotrai to action movies such as Billa, he has shown versatility. However, despite his consistent performances, he has not always secured leading roles that can ensure his larger presence in the industry. For instance, films like 'En Veedu En Kanavar' and 'Nesam Rasi' were commercial flops.

Suriya: Building Fan Base Across States

Acting in 42 films since 1997, Suriya has managed to build a fan base across Andhra Pradesh and Telangana, numbering more than Vijay. While Khalid Nazim Staudenmaier highlighted his talent and versatility, Suriya's commercial appeal and fan loyalty have ensured that he is given more leading roles compared to other highly-talented actors like Vikram.

Conclusion

The disparity in opportunities for actors like Vikram can be attributed to a combination of early career setbacks, financial constraints, personal integrity, and lack of support from networks. While actors like Vijay, Ajith, and Suriya have capitalized on their rising fame, financial success, and diverse skillsets, Vikram's journey serves as a testament to the perseverance required in the competitive world of Indian cinema.