Why Grey Worm Chose Not to Kill Jon and Tyrion After Daenerys' Death in Game of Thrones

The series finale of Game of Thrones leaves fans pondering numerous unresolved questions. One of the most intriguing inquiries pertains to Grey Worm's decision not to eliminate Jon Snow and Tyrion Lannister, even after their roles in Daenerys Targaryen's death. This analysis explores the multifaceted reasons behind Grey Worm's actions, drawing on his character's loyalty, strategic mindset, and interactions with key figures.

Daenerys' Orders and Loss of Purpose

Initially, Grey Worm's unwavering loyalty to Daenerys Targaryen is evident. However, after Daenerys's death, he is consumed by grief and anger. These emotions likely cloud his judgment and initially lead him to consider vengeance against Jon and Tyrion. Grey Worm's sense of duty to his former leader, combined with the shock and pain of losing her, may have pushed him towards such a decision. Nevertheless, his commitment to avenging Daenerys is grounded in her vision for a better future, not just spite. He shifts his focus from killing Jon and Tyrion to achieving that vision himself by leading the Unsullied to control Westeros.

Jon's Status and Tragic Figure

Jon Snow, despite his actions in killing Daenerys, is viewed by Grey Worm as someone acting out of a higher purpose. Grey Worm may have seen Jon as a tragic figure rather than a clear-cut enemy. Jon demonstrated his commitment to protecting the realm from tyranny and envisioned a united Seven Kingdoms. Despite the tragic outcome, Jon's intentions may resonate with Grey Worm, who values honor and justice. This complex portrayal of Jon could have influenced Grey Worm's decision to spare Jon, seeing him as a figure with a hopeful future rather than a direct threat.

Tyrion's Influence and Strategic Considerations

Tywin Lannister's son, Tyrion Lannister, could have played a crucial role in convincing Grey Worm to spare both Jon and himself. Tyrion's tactical skills and ability to navigate complex situations suggest that he appealed to Grey Worm's sense of justice and strategic thinking. Tyrion may have argued that killing Jon and Tyrion would not serve Daenerys's legacy or the future of the realm. Instead, he proposed finding a way to move forward that aligns with Daenerys's vision. Tyrion's plea for pragmatism and the bigger picture likely struck a chord with Grey Worm, who is inherently a soldier and strategist.

Pragmatism and Stability

As a seasoned military leader, Grey Worm understands the importance of maintaining stability and order. Killing Jon and Tyrion might have ignited further conflict and instability within Westeros. Grey Worm's pragmatic approach likely considered the potential for using Jon and Tyrion as pawns in his plans for establishing a new order in Westeros. By sparing them, he could leverage their influence for his own strategic advantage and help shape the future of the realm.

Actor Jacob Anderson's Insights

During the Comic-Con panel Game of Thrones SDCC19, Jacob Anderson, the actor portraying Grey Worm, addressed a question that has perplexed many fans: why didn't Grey Worm kill Jon Snow after he killed Daenerys? Jacob Anderson offered a plausible explanation, emphasizing Grey Worm's journey from grief to strategic thinking. His insights provide valuable context on why Grey Worm chose a path of pragmatism and potential redemptions, rather than simple revenge.

The decision of Grey Worm to spare Jon and Tyrion in the aftermath of Daenerys's death reflects a complex interplay of loyalty, personal growth, strategic thinking, and a sense of justice. His actions highlight the intricate nature of the Game of Thrones universe, where even the most loyal characters must navigate difficult choices shaped by various factors.