Why Good Television Gets Canceled While Mediocre Shows Continue

The television industry is a complex and ever-evolving landscape, where the fate of a show can hinge on as much luck as skill. Yet, there are certain trends that stand out, particularly when it comes to the cancellation of promising series. How can it be that two critically and ostensibly decent shows like Terra Nova and Revolution were canceled, while the vacated slots were filled with less desirable programming?

The Case of Terra Nova

Terra Nova, produced by the legendary film director Steven Spielberg, was a high-profile project that attracted significant attention for its futuristic storyline and intricate hazards. Despite its positive reception, with an IMDB rating of 6.7, the show ultimately failed to secure a future beyond its cancellation by Fox. This raises questions about the decision-making process within the industry and the factors that influence show cancellations.

Why Revolution Hits Hard and Has a Problem

Revolution, on the other hand, was a relative success, successfully hitting its target audience and even landing a form of renewal. However, despite its initial popularity, the show faced its share of challenges. It's a stark reminder that even when a series garners positive reception and has a dedicated fanbase, it can still face significant hurdles in long-term sustainability.

Subjectivity in Picking Hit Shows

The notion that certain shows, like the highly rated Warehouse 13 or even the widely maligned NCIS, can be critically admired or subjectively disliked highlights the subjectivity involved in the TV industry. It underscores the challenge for producers, networks, and viewers to align their expectations. If one truly believes they have "great taste," they can attempt to prove it by making savvy investments, much like investing in the stock market or finding the next big hit.

Blame and Accountability in Cancellation Decisions

Both Terra Nova and Revolution were canceled under controversial circumstances. Terra Nova was simply deemed non-viable by Fox, with no explanation offered. In contrast, Revolution received an extra season for a silly reason—a "Silence of the Lambs" spin-off called Hannibal—eventually leading to its cancellation. These decisions, made by executives and network managers, often lack transparency and accountability.

Comparing the Lasting Footprints of Cancelled Shows

Among the numerous canceled shows, those produced with care, ambition, and foresight leave a more lasting impact. Shows like Terra Nova and Revolution stand the test of time and continue to be remembered, even as the subpar programming that replaces them is quickly forgotten. This phenomenon reflects not only the quality of the series but also the enduring influence of good content over time.

The television industry ought to reconsider its methods and criteria in deciding the long-term viability of its shows. A transparent and more data-driven approach could help ensure that money is better spent on programming that resonates with audiences and leaves a lasting impact, rather than on fleeting, mediocre content.