Why Does the POTUS Still Rally Despite 1 Million Active Coronavirus Cases?

The decision by the President of the United States (the POTUS) to hold rallies with thousands of supporters in the midst of a dire pandemic, with over 1 million active coronavirus cases, raises several significant questions regarding public health, political strategies, and personal motivations. In this analysis, we explore why such actions can persist despite overwhelming evidence of potential harm.

Public Health vs. Political Strategy

The argument that these rallies are justified can be seen as a trade-off between public health and political strategy. While the spread of the virus at such events can be concerning, it is not necessarily an automatic indication that the rallies are inappropriately or irresponsibly organized.

One argument often put forward is the undeniable fact that numerous deaths (over 660,000 in the U.S. at the time) have occurred, leading to a belief that the pandemic is under control. This perception fuels the idea that the public may no longer feel the presence of a serious threat, thus diminishing concerns about holding such events.

Empathy and Psychological Conditions

Another consideration is the underlying psychosocial profile of the POTUS. Discussions in the psychological literature suggest that individuals suffering from malignant narcissism are characterized by a lack of empathy and a propensity to manipulate others for personal gain. If the POTUS is indeed suffering from such a condition, it is less about the well-being of his supporters and more about his own motivations.

Supporter Loyalty and Political Necessity

The question of whether the POTUS holds these events because he cares little for the health of his supporters is also relevant. Supporting figures and politicians have often noted the deeply polarized nature of modern politics, where one side may view actions and decisions as driven more by political loyalty than genuine concern for societal welfare. This loyalty might be demonstrated through attendance at rallies, which can serve to bolster his support base.

Legal and Constitutional Rights

Legally, the issue of holding public rallies is tied to the first amendment rights and the right to freedom of speech and assembly. It is the responsibility of the government to ensure public safety and health. However, the point that it remains perfectly acceptable for rioters and protestors to assemble while the POTUS’s supporters are not, raises important questions about selective enforcement and fairness.

Personal Accountability

Ultimately, the decision to hold such rallies is a personal choice. The POTUS is entitled to assess the risks and make decisions based on his own analysis. While legally and ethically questionable, the decision to hold rallies in this context can be understood as a personal or strategic choice, rather than a delinquency rooted in a deep concern for public health.

Conclusion

Whether the POTUS’s actions are driven by a lack of empathy, a calculated risk management strategy, or a desire to maintain support, these rallies highlight the complexities of balancing public health with political ambitions. Further discussions and measures to protect public health must continue.