Why Does the Class Structure Persist in 'Snowpiercer' Given the Prominence of Post-Money Society?

The film 'Snowpiercer' is often lauded for its thought-provoking exploration of a post-apocalyptic world where societal norms have drastically changed. Yet, one of the most intriguing aspects of the movie is the persistence of a strict class structure, despite the fact that money is rendered useless. This article delves into the symbolic significance of class structure in 'Snowpiercer' and why it still exists.

Class Structure as a Metaphor for Our World

At its core, 'Snowpiercer' serves as a powerful metaphor for our world. The train, with its front representing the wealthy elite and the rear representing the impoverished masses, mirrors the stark reality of social stratification. The front of the train is occupied by 'First Class' citizens—individuals who use the rest of the populace for menial jobs and treat them as disposable.

These First Class individuals retain access to the best resources and services, leaving the 'Third Class' inhabitants with the worst and most dangerous jobs. This setup is not intended to provide equality; rather, it is designed to perpetuate the power and privilege of the First Class. They hold onto the so-called 'money' as a facade of control, symbolizing their continued dominance and the exploitation of the lower classes.

The Uselessness of Money in a Symbolic Context

The significance of money’s uselessness in the society of 'Snowpiercer' cannot be overstated. While 'money' is rendered meaningless in a literal sense, it remains a potent symbol of power and control. The upper class citizens, despite lacking the tangible value associated with money, maintain their grip on the hierarchy. This symbolism underscores the fallacy that money itself is the sole determinant of social status and power.

It is a powerful reminder that the entire hierarchy of social class is "meaningless" in its traditional sense. The symbolism of the movie being set on a train further emphasizes that the capitalist system operates within a fixed track, with no room for change or evolution. The social structure remains static because the system itself is deeply entrenched and resistant to transformative change.

Distinguishing Between Money and Power

The persistence of the class structure in 'Snowpiercer' also highlights a fundamental truth about the nature of power. The movie underscores that the distinction between money and power is essential. Several English kings were broke but still wielded the power of kingship. Money and power are two different yet interrelated elements, with power often being more durable and long-lasting than mere financial wealth.

It is this understanding that explains why the class structure continues to exist, even in a society devoid of monetary value. The true power lies not in the possession of money but in the control over resources, services, and the lives of others. This is epitomized by the First Class's ability to maintain a semblance of control through their dominance, even when money is no longer a tangible currency.

Conclusion

'Snowpiercer' invites us to question the very foundations of societal hierarchy. By exploring a world where money is rendered meaningless, the movie reveals that power and control can manifest in various forms. The class structure persists because the mechanisms of power remain intact, regardless of the symbolic nature of money.

Ultimately, 'Snowpiercer' challenges viewers to consider the underlying dynamics of social stratification and the ways in which power can persist even in the face of changing circumstances. This film serves as a poignant reminder of the enduring nature of power and the need to understand the complex interplay between different forms of control in society.