Why Do People Dislike J.R.R. Tolkien’s Works?
Why Do People Dislike J.R.R. Tolkien’s Works?
J.R.R. Tolkien is a name synonymous with rich narrative worlds, complex characters, and immersive storytelling. His works, including ldquo;The Hobbitrdquo; and the Lord of the Rings trilogy, have captivated readers for decades, leaving an indelible mark on the fantasy genre. However, there are those who find these works unsuitable, and herein we explore some reasons behind this stance.
The Standard Storytelling Format vs. The Silmarillion
Readability and Accessibility: Works like The Hobbit and the Lord of the Rings trilogy are well-structured and accessible to a wide audience. They maintain a flow, familiar to many readers, and are easier to follow due to their well-defined narrative arcs and characters. In contrast, The Silmarillion, a compilation of Tolkien’s longer works and various stories, lacks the linear narrative often found in The Hobbit and Lord of the Rings. This collection is more akin to a history-style book, composed of smaller stories that are interconnected.
By way of a personal example, when my wife read The Hobbit and Lord of the Rings, she was engaged and captivated. However, she found The Silmarillion to be far less engaging. Despite this, Christopher Tolkien, J.R.R. Tolkien’s son, did an admirable job in completing many of his father's works. He maintains a deep understanding of Middle-earth, much like his father, ensuring a consistent and authentic narrative thread throughout.
Realism vs. Escapism
Realist and Escapist Literature: Another reason people might dislike Tolkien’s works is their perceived deviation from realism. Some readers believe that literature should reflect real-world conditions and experiences rather than engage in fantasy. They see Tolkien’s works as a mere escapism, a tool for readers to avoid confronting harsh realities.
In reality, Tolkien’s works serve a dual purpose. They offer escapism, but also provide a profound reflection on human nature, society, and the complexities of good and evil. He infuses his stories with themes of duty, sacrifice, and the enduring power of kindness, making his works both entertaining and thought-provoking. For those who find escapism to be glorified fantasy and fantasy to be superficial, Tolkien’s works may not align with their personal literary preferences.
The Complexity of The Lord of the Rings
Narrative Complexity: The Lord of the Rings trilogy is notably more complex than The Hobbit. The trilogy is packed with intricate plot lines, a wide cast of characters, and a rich historical and cultural background. Characters in the trilogy are deeply developed, often with complex relationships and histories, which can be challenging to keep track of. This level of detail can be overwhelming for some readers.
For those who struggle to maintain this mental inventory, the books may be too complex to fully engage with, leading some to put them down and never return to them. The immersive nature of the trilogy can also be disorienting for new readers, who may find the sheer volume of information daunting. However, for those willing to invest time and effort, the payoff is a world that feels both expansive and deeply rooted.
The Adaptation to Film
Films vs. Books: The adaptation of The Lord of the Rings to film has also polarized opinions. Fans of the books often have high expectations for film adaptations, and while the movies did a commendable job of capturing the essence of Tolkien’s vision, they can fall short in certain aspects. Film adaptations must consider the constraints of budget, time, and audience appeal, leading to some changes and omissions.
The films, directed by Peter Jackson, were a massive undertaking, with sweeping scenes, detailed settings, and a compelling cast. Despite these strengths, some fans argue that the films added elements that were not in the books, such as certain battle scenes and dark tones. However, these elements do not change the core narrative or the overall vision of the trilogy. Instead, they cater to the modern audience’s preference for visual grandeur and cinematic storytelling.
For those who grew up reading the books and have distinct memories of the stories, a film adaptation can be a mixed experience. While the films can enhance one’s understanding and appreciation of the books, they can also distort the reader’s imagination and interpretation. However, it is important to recognize that film adaptations are their own art form, with their unique ways of conveying Tolkien’s vision.
Conclusion
tLiking or disliking Tolkien’s works is a purely personal choice. Some find his detailed, complex worlds and characters to be enriching, while others may find them overwhelming or escapist. The Hobbit and Lord of the Rings offer both escapism and profound reflection, making them valuable additions to any literary collection. And while film adaptations can enhance the experience, they should be appreciated for what they are – a different form of storytelling.