Why Did Harry and Meghan Face Criticism on Remembrance Day?

Amidst the somber observance of Remembrance Day, Harry and Meghan faced a storm of controversy and criticism. Questions are being raised about why they were targeted, especially when the elements of their royal duties are often scrutinized with relentless scrutiny.

Understanding the Criticism

The public's reaction towards Harry and Meghan's involvement in Remembrance Day can be attributed to several factors, many of which center around their perceived inattention to protocol and a general sense of insincerity.

Efforts to document their visit, such as bringing photographers, have led to the perception that they are more concerned with publicity than the solemnity of the occasion. Critics argue that the royal couple should not publicize their attendance if they do not wish to be seen, but should proceed privately if they are sincere about showing respect.

Why They Deserve Criticism

The hatred and disapproval directed at Harry and Meghan stem from a combination of their narcissistic behavior, insincerity, and perpetuation of false narratives about their experiences.

The Paige Valentine blog post highlights the damaging impact of their actions on public perception. Their behavior during Remembrance Day was seen as inconsiderate, particularly the act of walking on soldiers' graves, which is seen as a disrespectful gesture by many. Their decision to bring photographers to document their visit was viewed as self-serving and aimed at gaining more public attention than was warranted by the solemnity of the occasion.

The Background of Their Controversy

Before diving into the specifics of the Remembrance Day visit, it is important to understand the context of their situation. The public's perception of Harry and Meghan's role within the Royal Family has been colored by numerous incidents, including their hasty departure from the UK after the Royal Wedding, their treatment of staff, and Meghan's attempts to gain financial and personal advantages from her royal status.

Their controlling and pushy behavior, which they claimed to be the result of racism and other injustices, was seen as self-serving and entitled. Their behavior had a significant impact on their relationship with the British public, as well as the institutions they represented.

Public Perception and the Impact of Their Actions

When the Royal Family became involved in Remembrance Day, the public's initial reaction was one of love and appreciation. They welcomed Harry and Meghan into the family, hoping to see a positive influence on the future of the monarchy.

However, as time progressed and their behavior became more publicized, it became increasingly clear that they were not just mere tokens of hope and unity. Their public conduct and the narratives they created about their experiences were seen as manipulative and self-serving. This, combined with instances of public misconduct and disregard for proper protocol, resulted in a steady erosion of public trust.

For example, Meghan's public whining about being a Disney Princess and her attempts to alter the Royal Family for financial gain were seen as deeply damaging. Her insincere attempts to gain sympathy by playing the victim in the face of allegations and lies were also widely criticized. Such actions led to a sense of betrayal and disapproval among the public and the institutions they represented.

The Double Standard of Criticism

It is important to acknowledge that in the realm of privacy and royal customs, there is often a double standard. When the Royal Family members, especially Harry and Meghan, are seen to be insincere or disrespectful, the public and media react with punitive dismissal.

For instance, their Remembrance Day visit was met with criticism not because the Royal Family receives no scrutiny, but because their actions were perceived as willful disrespect or insincerity. The criticism faced by Harry and Meghan is often more intense and without mercy due to their perceived privileged status. This scrutiny, while at times unfair, highlights the importance of maintaining decorum and respect when representing a national institution.

Conclusion

In summary, the criticism faced by Harry and Meghan on Remembrance Day and beyond is a reflection of their behavior, actions, and the role they play within the Royal Family. While it is important to remember that no one is without faults, the extent and nature of criticism faced by them have raised significant questions about their appropriateness within this esteemed institution.

As they continue to navigate public and royal life, their actions and public behavior will inevitably be subject to scrutiny. The public's love and goodwill towards them are increasingly tied to their ability to demonstrate genuine respect, humility, and integrity, especially during solemn occasions like Remembrance Day.

Keywords: paige valentine, remembrance day, royal family