Why Did BJP Select Sadhvi Pragya as Their Candidate?

The selection of Sadhvi Pragya as a candidate by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has sparked considerable debate. Understanding the context and motivations behind this decision is essential for comprehending the broader political dynamics at play. This article aims to provide insights into why Sadhvi Pragya was chosen as the BJP candidate and the implications of this choice.

Accusations and Convictions

Addressing a common misconception, it's important to note that Sadhvi Pragya is not a convicted individual. She is merely accused, though the charges against her have never been substantiated. The distinction is crucial because it highlights the difference between someone who is accused and someone who has been found guilty. In the political arena, even if an individual is accused, it is not necessarily a bar to electoral participation, unless the accusation pertains to heinous crimes such as rape or murder.

During the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) era, numerous MPs and MLAs were accused of various scams, yet they continued to contest elections. Critics argue that if being an accused is such a significant deterrent, why do these leaders remain in the race? The reasoning provided by the BJP is that being accused is not necessarily a significant crime if the legal system has not confirmed the charges.

Fighting Back Against 'Saffron Terror'

The term "saffron terror" was coined by the UPA government to circulate a narrative of alleged Hindutva terror. Digvijaya Singh was a strong proponent of this narrative, blaming the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) for various attacks, including those of 26/11, Batla House, and Malegaon, all of which occurred during the UPA's tenure.

To counter this narrative and to demonstrate to voters that accusations do not hold merit, Sadhvi Pragya was fielded as a candidate and won convincingly. The BJP's decision to support Sadhvi Pragya was strategic, aimed at countering the UPA's rhetoric and showcasing the BJP's ability to provide a clear and effective response to such claims.

Advantages of Her Candidacy

There are a few key reasons for the BJP’s decision to select Sadhvi Pragya as their candidate:

Unstable Reputation of INC Candidates: was the INC candidate for BPL, but he does not hold a good reputation in the city. This lack of public goodwill may have prompted the BJP to choose Sadhvi Pragya, who can bring a fresh perspective.Promoting Hindutva Policy: Choosing Sadhvi Pragya also serves a strategic purpose of promoting the BJP’s Hindutva agenda, as she is a prominent figure in the Hindutva movement.Strategic Importance of BPL Seat: The BPL seat is a crucial ground for the BJP. Winning from there can consolidate the party’s base and strengthen its position in the region.

The decision to field Sadhvi Pragya underscores the BJP’s strategic choices in navigating the complex political landscape, balancing accusations against her with the broader goals of national politics.

Historical Context and Legal Context

Understanding the historical context of legal actions against lawmakers is essential. Since 1984, under the rule of the UPA-INC combined coalition, criminal lawmakers have sought to escape legal repercussions by using task forces, committees, and commissions. However, the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) took a different approach by consistently giving seats back to accused individuals like Sadhvi Pragya, often to counter the unfavorable narrative of "saffron terror" and the accusation of illegal activities by the opposition.

The BJP's decision to support Sadhvi Pragya can be seen as a strategic move to dismantle the narrative of illegal activities by the opposition and to reinforce the idea that being accused alone does not necessarily disqualify an individual from political leadership.

Conclusion

The selection of Sadhvi Pragya as a BJP candidate involves multiple layers of strategic calculus and political maneuvering. Her candidacy is not merely a reflection of her personal standing but is also influenced by broader political narratives and the dynamics within the Indian political landscape. Understanding these aspects provides a clearer picture of why Sadhvi Pragya was chosen and what this decision means for the future of politics in India.