Why Certain Dinosaurs Deserve a Place in Jurassic Park and World: Triceratops and Gigantoraptor

Introduction

The Jurassic Park and Jurassic World series have captivated audiences with their vivid depictions of dinosaurs. However, some experts and fans believe that certain species should have been included, either for their unique characteristics or to provide a more comprehensive narrative. This article will explore the reasons why Ceratopsians, such as Triceratops, and the Gigantoraptor should have been part of the Jurassic Park and Jurassic World franchises.

Triceratops: The Iconic Ceratopsian

Triceratops is not just one of the most recognizable dinosaurs; it is a symbol of prehistoric power and grandeur. Despite their significant presence in popular culture, the Triceratops has not been given the prominent role they arguably deserve in the Jurassic Park and Jurassic World movies, with the exception of brief appearances in Jurassic Park III and Jurassic World: Dominion. Yet, their absence from the main plotlines is notably damaging to the narrative, leaving audiences feeling incomplete.

The Iconic Features and Key Role

Triceratops, with their imposing size, distinctive horns, and frills, would serve as formidable antagonists or protagonists in a narrative that plays out in the way of the dinosaurs. Their presence would not only add to the authenticity of the films but also provide a key challenge for the predators. Their 7 feet long horns and approximately 30 feet length naturally set them apart from other herbivores, giving them a unique role in the ecosystem of the parks. A male Triceratops with its horns and frills could act as a dominant figure, challenging the tyrannosaurus and other theropods, thereby adding dynamic tension to the storyline.

Moreover, Triceratops are depicted in the Dominion as they clamber over a bridge to escape the dinosaurs and into safety. However, their involvement in the plot is minimal, and they do not offer the grandeur and drama that one might expect from such a iconic species. Imagine a sequence where the main protagonists must cross a chasm, only to have a relentless Triceratops blocking their path, effectively trapping them. This scenario would not only heighten the suspense and excitement of the story but also provide a fascinating exploration of interspecies conflict, cooperation, and survival.

Gigantoraptor: The Stealthy and Terrorized Dragon

Gigantoraptor, a giant raptor from Mongolia, is often overlooked in the dinosaur movies but deserves the spotlight for a multitude of reasons. Located on the smaller size spectrum compared to a Tyrannosaurus, the Gigantoraptor is easily overlooked. However, its speed, agility, and strategic intelligence make it an excellent candidate for inclusion in both Jurassic Park and Jurassic World.

Speed, Agility, and Strategic Intelligence

The Gigantoraptor is remarkable for its ability to run incredibly fast, swiftly navigating through the lush environments. It is just over one-third the size of a Tyrannosaurus, but its speed and cunning make it an equally menacing predator. While smaller, its speed and agility would complement the more bulky theropods, creating a dynamic and engaging landscape for the characters to navigate.

Another pivotal characteristic of the Gigantoraptor is its ability to leap and cover gaps. This trait is particularly useful in environments where quick movement between high points is crucial. Unlike other theropods that are limited to ground-based movement, the Gigantoraptor could easily jump and cover gaps, providing a unique challenge to the protagonists and other creatures. This would enhance the action sequences and offer a fresh perspective on dinosaur interaction and behavior.

Why Certain Dinosaurs Shouldn't Be in the Movies

While the addition of Triceratops and Gigantoraptor would greatly enhance the Jurassic Park and Jurassic World movies, it is also important to consider which dinosaurs might have been included but were better left out due to various reasons. For instance, certain species, while scientifically fascinating, may not have added significant value to the plot or cinematic experience.

Why Carnotaurus Would Not Be Ideal

Carnotaurus, a stalk-shouldered, hump-backed dinosaur, while visually striking, would not have been the best fit for the movie franchise. Carnotaurus has a compressed pelvis and laterally compressed scapulae, but from a storytelling perspective, it does not offer as much tactical or narrative value as the other species. While its unique appearance and behavior might be intriguing, their inclusion may have felt unnecessary or detracted from the plot in terms of pacing and drama.

Additionally, the size and behavior of Carnotaurus do not align well with the overarching themes of the Jurassic Park series, which often focus on larger and more traditional theropods. The inclusion of Carnotaurus might have overshadowed the other, more iconic and prevalent dinosaurs, leading to a less cohesive and less impactful storytelling experience.

Conclusion

While the Jurassic Park and Jurassic World series have set the standard for dinosaur-related entertainment, there is always room for improvement and expansion. By including iconic species like Triceratops and the intriguing Gigantoraptor, the movies could have provided a more complete and dynamic exploration of the prehistoric world. However, it is important to balance the inclusion of new dinosaurs with the narrative needs and pacing of the story. By doing so, the movies could have not only entertained but also educated and provided a more engaging cinematic experience.