Why Attacking the Sept of Baelor Would Put Cersei, Margaery and Loras in Danger in Game of Thrones

Introduction to the Conflict in Game of Thrones

Game of Thrones is a television series that is known for its complex political and religious dynamics. One notable episode involves the characters from House Lannister, specifically King Tommen and his advisors, saying that attacking the High Sparrow and the Faith Militant would put Cersei Lannister, Margaery Tyrell, and Loras Tyrell in danger. In this article, we will explore the deeper reasoning behind these statements and the beliefs of the Faith Militant in the world of Westeros.

Understanding the Faith Militant and Their Beliefs

The Faith Militant is an organization within the Seven Kingdoms that believes in a strict interpretation of their religious duties, often denouncing acts such as murder and treason. They stand by the principle that people are guilty until proven innocent. This algorithm significantly influences their actions and decisions, which often conflicts with the secular government of Westeros.

The Faith's Position on Guilt and Innocence

The Faith Militant's belief in "guilty until proven innocent" is a core tenet of their faith. They do not acknowledge the legal system's concept of presumption of innocence. In their eyes, any person or group believed to be guilty should be punished, regardless of whether they have been convicted in a court of law. This strict interpretation means that, in their minds, Cersei Lannister, Margaery Tyrell, and Loras Tyrell, as accused individuals, are indeed guilty of the crimes they are accused of.

Why Attacking the Sept of Baelor Would Be Risky

The Sept of Baelor is a significant religious building in King's Landing, housing the High Septon and his followers, including the Faith Militant. Attacking this site would be perceived by the Faith Militant as an attack on the role of the High Septon and the religious authority he represents. Under their principles, any attack on the Sept of Baelor would be seen as an act of treason against the religious order.

The Impact of the Faith Militant's Actions

When the Faith Militant executes even prisoners, it aligns with their belief in the 'eye for an eye' principle and their strict interpretation of justice. However, this practice is deeply at odds with the public perception of justice and moral conduct. Their actions demonstrate their commitment to their principles and their willingness to enforce their interpretation of religious law, no matter the cost. Their violent acts, including the execution of prisoners, are a direct reflection of their uncompromising approach to justice.

Case of Guilt and Innocence in Game of Thrones

Back to the case of Cersei, Margaery, and Loras, their status as perceived enemies of the Faith Militant makes them targets. If the Sept of Baelor were attacked, the Faith Militant would logically interpret this as an act to eliminate the perceived enemies. Consequently, releasing or even trying to rescue them would be seen as facilitating a crime against the Faith. The Faith Militant would then consider these actions as aiding and abetting the attackers, making them all but guaranteed to be targeted themselves.

Secession vs. Surrender

Considering that Cersei, Margaery, and Loras are all imprisoned by the Faith Militant, any attempt to free or rescue them would involve engaging directly with the individuals holding them captive. Given the Faith Militant's interpretation of guilt, any rescue would be seen as an attempt to protect guilty persons, and any rescue mission would thus be viewed as an extension of the attackers' actions.

Conclusion and Reflection

Attacking the Sept of Baelor would significantly increase the risk of retribution on King Tommen, Cersei Lannister, Margaery Tyrell, and Loras Tyrell, as it would involve direct attacks on the Faith Militant and their perceived enemies. This conflict highlights the complex and often violent intersections of politics and religion in the world of Game of Thrones. The belief in the Faith Militant's strict interpretation of guilt and punishment makes such an attack particularly dangerous and sets up a scenario where all parties would be at risk.

By understanding the principles of the Faith Militant, we can appreciate the strategic reasoning behind the character's caution and the precarious position they find themselves in. This analysis of the religious belief system and its impact on the plot adds depth and complexity to the narrative of Game of Thrones, inviting further reflection on the themes of justice, religion, and power.