Why Are SJWs Triggered When Sharing the ‘Clinton Cash’ Documentary on Social Media?

It seems that occasionally, social media users encounter reactions that can be quite intense, especially when they share certain content. One such scenario involves the sharing of the 'Clinton Cash' documentary and the subsequent trigger responses that some receive from supporters of the identity political movement, often referred to as 'SJWs' (Social Justice Warriors). If by 'triggered' you mean, 'were tired of listening to your stupidity so this is my first and last contact with you,' then yes, it appears that a significant number of individuals belonging to this identity-political group react strongly to the content.

The 'Trigger' Reaction

Understanding this dynamic involves recognizing the polarized nature of online discourse. The terms 'SJWs' often refer to individuals who are highly activist and vocal in promoting social justice causes. When these individuals and their allies perceive what they view as misinformation or a perceived attack on their values, they can become highly emotional and confrontational.

This type of strong reaction can be seen when users share materials such as the 'Clinton Cash' documentary on social media. The 'Clinton Cash' documentary was widely criticized for its lack of substantiated evidence and its focus on unsubstantiated claims. When supporters of the identity-political movement come across such content, they often find it deeply offensive as it challenges the narratives and positions they hold dear.

Anatomy of the 'Trigger' Reaction

The reaction from SJWs can be dissected as follows:

Perceived Misinformation: The 'Clinton Cash' documentary is often cited as an example of misinformation. It has been criticized for its reliance on poorly sourced information and making sweeping, unsupported allegations. Challenging Established Narratives: The content presented often challenges the widely accepted and often invoked narrative of corruption and wrongdoing among government officials, which can be deeply entrenched in the minds of many. Bias and Prejudgment: Supporters of SJWs often react with a high level of bias and prejudgment. They may not engage with the content on its merits but instead, react emotionally based on their existing beliefs and emotional investment.

Content Analysis and Criticism

Delving into the specific content of the 'Clinton Cash' documentary provides further insight into why such a strong reaction might occur. The piece argues against the film's factual basis, stating that

Legality and Resources: Pointing out that the Republican Party dedicated significant resources and legal talent to scrutinize Hillary Clinton and her finances without finding strong evidence of wrongdoing. Uranium One Allegations: Highlighting the allegation of the Uranium One uranium deal as a lie, explaining that the Foundation is regularly inspected and receives an AAA rating each year. Russia Investigation: Emphasizing that the Russia investigation has led to significant indictments and the recovery of over $54 million, while 'Clinton Cash' is described as a "nothing burger" by comparison.

These points reveal the stark contrast between the perceived 'fact-based' critique and the sensationalist claims made in the documentary, thereby justifying the 'triggers' that follow when users share this content.

Conclusion

Understanding why SJWs are 'triggered' when sharing the 'Clinton Cash' documentary involves recognizing the emotional and political investment many have in the narratives and perceived truths they hold. It is crucial to critically engage with the content and evaluate sources of information with a balanced and objective lens.