Why 4 Years in Prison for Former President Trump is Insufficient

According to recent developments in legal proceedings, Michael Cohen, Mr. Trump's former business associate, received a 4-year prison sentence for his role in the "cooked-books" scandal. Given that Cohen was merely a henchman while Trump was both the instigator and primary beneficiary, it would be reasonable to suggest that Trump should receive a similar sentence. Sentencing guidelines could potentially allow for a 20-year prison term for similar infractions. However, even with these guidelines, 4 years in prison seems insufficient compared to the 34 felony convictions that Trump faced.

Current Sentencing and Arguments for Additional Years in Prison

The case against Trump highlights a number of questionable elements. Firstly, the conviction that led to the 4-year sentence was part of a 'kangaroo court' that may have violated Trump's civil rights. There's evidence that the legal system was manipulated due to political motivations, specifically targeting Trump rather than dealing with the crime.

It has also been suggested that Trump's conviction will be overturned on appeal. Despite years of legal investigations, the legal strategy seems to have been ineffective, relying on an unprecedented and possibly unconstitutional legal theory. This raises serious questions about the integrity of the judicial process and the potential for additional charges and convictions.

The ongoing legal battles suggest that Trump still faces several criminal cases. These cases include the pending IRS charges, among others. If Trump is indeed guilty, he could face an extended period in prison. The 4-year sentence is inadequate considering the severity and number of charges, and the additional potential charges could extend his prison term significantly.

Deserved Prison Time and Public Arguments

Public outcry and advocacy for extended prison time are growing. Some argue that Trump should serve, at the very least, four years in prison. The phrase "he's in the fucking can for four years" reflects the public sentiment. This demand is further amplified by the ongoing investigations and potential additional charges. The argument goes that the sentence should be extended to "serve eight or whatever it takes to serve four," especially considering the recent conviction in Manhattan.

Additionally, there are calls for more severe sentences due to the scale of the crimes. The 34 counts of charges warrant a much longer sentence. Advocates for increased punishment argue that the 4-year sentence is a mere slap on the wrist and should be revised to reflect the gravity of the crimes and the potential for further convictions.

Conclusion: Justify the Length of Sentiment to Fit the Crimes

In conclusion, while 4 years in prison for such serious crimes is insufficient, the public outcry and evidence of further crimes suggest that the sentence should be prolonged. Trump's behavior and the evidence against him warrant a more substantial prison term. The current legal proceedings and potential future charges provide ample justification for this longer sentence, ensuring that justice is served and that Trump faces the consequences of his actions.

Vote to ensure accountability and justice for the American people. Lock him up! Save America! VOTE BLUE.