FilmFunhouse

Location:HOME > Film > content

Film

Who was in the Wrong in Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire: Ron or Hermione?

January 14, 2025Film3523
Who was in the Wrong in Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire: Ron or He

Who was in the Wrong in Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire: Ron or Hermione?

Introduction

In ldquo;Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire,rdquo; tensions between Harry and Ron reach a boiling point. This conflict is often attributed to Ron, primarily due to his initial aggressive stance, claiming Harry was lying. However, a deeper analysis reveals that both characters contributed to the misunderstanding. The focus here shifts to Hermione Grangerrsquo;s role and whether she is equally at fault for exacerbating the situation.

Ron Weasley: The Accuser and the Defender

At the heart of the conflict lies Ron Weasley, who initiates the tension through his accusatory language and actions. Ronrsquo;s defending of his integrity and believing Harry was a liar sets the stage for further confrontation. His persistent stance and inability to acknowledge his own role in the dispute make him appear immature and jealous, despite being well aware that Harry dislikes being the center of attention.

Hermione Granger: The Mediator and the Spark

Hermione Granger, on the other hand, plays a pivotal role by not only supporting Harry but also by mediating the conflict. Her actions, although well-intentioned, often backfire, causing further damage to the fragile relationship between Harry and Ron. Instead of facilitating a peaceful resolution, Hermionersquo;s insistence that Ron was jealous and her lack of diplomatic language further prolong the tension.

The Lack of Genuine Apologies

One of the most disheartening aspects of this conflict is the absence of genuine apologies from Ron. When he finally tries to address the issue, his attempt remains superficial, with lines like, ldquo;Um, I guess someone really was trying to get you killed.rdquo; This dismissive effort falls short of a true apology and belies his continued immaturity. Ron remains unwilling to take responsibility for his actions, making a full reconciliation nearly impossible.

Hermionersquo;s Role in Protracting the Conflict

Hermionersquo;s role in prolonging the conflict is perhaps the most contentious. Instead of calming the situation, her actions often exacerbate the issues between Harry and Ron. Her unwavering belief in Ronrsquo;s jealousy and her failure to use phrases like ldquo;in my opinionrdquo; and ldquo;I thinkrdquo; further solidify Ronrsquo;s own perception that Harry and Hermione are putting him down. Hermionersquo;s lack of empathy and willingness to voice her thoughts bluntly contribute to the weeks-long rift between the three friends.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while Ron Weasley initiated the conflict through his accusations and defense of his own integrity, Hermione Grangerrsquo;s role in prolonging the tension cannot be ignored. Her lack of diplomatic language and unwavering belief in Ronrsquo;s jealousy play a significant role in keeping the friendship strained for weeks. While Ron may not fully own up to his actions, both characters share the blame for the prolonged conflict and the resulting estrangement in the friendship.

References

JK Rowling, ldquo;Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire,rdquo; Bloomsbury, 2000.