Who Would Have Been the Better Ruler: Daeron the Good or Daemon Blackfyre?

When it comes to the medieval kingdoms of Westeros, the debate over who would have made a better ruler, Daeron the Good or Daemon Blackfyre, is a fascinating one. Historically, one might assume that the ease of running a kingdom boils down to a simple matter of strategy and political acumen. However, the complexities of governance in a feudal society are far from straightforward, as exemplified by the myriad strategies of Age of Empires, Age of Mythology, and the Crusader Kings trilogy, which all grossly simplify the struggles of medieval leadership.

The Wilted Ball under Gunn Point

When faced with the dilemma of choosing a monarch between these two figures, a visceral response might prioritize the assurances of Daeron the Good. Known for his wisdom, scholarly demeanor, and diplomatic skills, Daeron seems to have the interior fortitude necessary to navigate the intricate web of political relationships and societal reforms. If pressed to the extreme, I would opt for Daeron. His ability to understand and translate the complexities of governance into positive societal changes is undeniable. Despite being called a 'nerd' by some, Daeron's selfless actions and commitment to societal improvement are commendable.

However, Daemon Blackfyre, on the other hand, although lacking Daeron's wisdom and scholarly qualities, is a compelling figure. Daemon’s attributes include a strong sense of honor, being a great warrior, and an excellent commander. These traits would have made him an ideal leader in times of war, much like the famous English kings who frequently supplanted French chivalry with practical military strategies during the long, drawn-out 100 Years' War. Daemon’s prowess on the battlefield and his popularity among the people are clear indications of his warrior spirit. Unfortunately, his rebellion was fueled by various rumors, one of which is the persistent belief that Daeron was a bastard. This alone sheds light on the political climate and public perception in Westeros, emphasizing the unpredictable nature of leadership contests.

Potential for Cooperative Governance

Imagine a scenario where Daeron and Daemon could coexist as dual monarchs or even hypothetically fused into a single entity. The result would be nothing short of a near-perfect rule, combining the best of both worlds – the scholarly wisdom and societal reforms of Daeron and the martial prowess and popularity of Daemon. This fusion would represent a harmonious blend of governance strategies, catering to both the intellectual and the physical aspects of leadership.

The Nitty Gritty of Ruling

While Daemon may have been adored and surrounded by a court of admirers, his actual experience in ruling appears limited. His responsibilities were often delegated to more competent and assertive men, as evidenced by Aegor Bittersteel founding the Golden Company and Gormon Peake raising his troops. These peripheral figures played a crucial role in the political and military structures during Daemon's reign. In contrast, Daeron, despite his 'nerd' image, was deeply involved in rallying the people and promoting societal changes. His union with a Dornishwoman also highlights his attempt to harmonize the political landscape.

Chivalry vs. Practical Governance

The debate about whether chivalry or practical governance is the path to success in a kingdom extends beyond the two figures we are discussing. In the history of both Westeros and the real world, practical governance often wins over the fa?ade of chivalry. Baelor Breakspear's victory over commoners wielding simple weapons reiterates the idea that in the realm of war and government, it is change and societal improvement that truly matter. Daemon’s ultimate end, betrayed and killed by a skilled archer, underscores the limitations of relying solely on physical prowess without a corresponding understanding of governance and strategy.

Moreover, the textual clues within Dunk and Egg further suggest that the concept of chivalry was weakening in the face of the realities of warfare and societal change. Dunk and Egg’s journey captures a transition, where traditional notions of honor and chivalry are tested against the practical demands of life in war and governance.

While Daemon’s aesthetic appeal and martial prowess were undoubtedly attributes, they were insufficient for lasting success in a kingdom. The true measure of a ruler lies in their ability to adapt to changing circumstances and enact meaningful reforms. Daeron, despite his lack of military glory, embodied this adaptability and dedication to societal improvement, making him a compelling choice for a ruler.