Who Will Sit upon the Iron Throne? The Final Battle and Beyond in Game of Thrones
Who Will Sit upon the Iron Throne? The Final Battle and Beyond in Game of Thrones
The concluding episodes of the TV series ldquo;Game of Thronesrdquo; have provided a sense of closure to its viewers, but the question of who will sit upon the Iron Throne remains a topic of speculation and debate. The choice of winner has eluded the beloved author George R.R. Martin (GRRM) for a prolonged period, leaving fans inundated with endless theories and predictions.
The Feudal Structure and Absolute Power
The series ldquo;Game of Thronesrdquo; delves deeply into the flawed system of feudalism and absolute power that underlies the Iron Throne. The incessant feuding and power struggles amongst various houses have always highlighted the futility of claiming the throne as a means to ultimate power. The underlying message has been clear: there is no rightful heir, and the entire structure of the Iron Throne is inherently corrupt and destructive.
The Collapse of the Throne
Furthermore, the show has consistently emphasized the notion that the Iron Throne itself is a symbol of corruption, oppression, and death. This can be seen in the final moments of the series, where the Iron Throne is no more. It is interesting to consider who might have taken the throne in the final season, but the text strongly suggests that no one will truly claim it as a true ruler.
The collapse of the Iron Throne is not just a metaphorical event; it is a physical one as well. In the final moments, it is speculated that Drogon, the dragon of Daenerys Targaryen, purposefully melted the throne, possibly as a way to symbolize the end of her destructive ambitions and the end of the feudal system that rules Westeros.
Alternatives to the Traditional Throne
Given the absence of a true heir and the destructive nature of the Iron Throne, it is interesting to consider the possibility of alternative power structures. The prestigious Bran Stark, who has intellectual prowess but is physically impeded, may not be the ideal candidate to sit upon it as he lacks the physical strength that is often associated with rulers. Instead, the text suggests that Bran might choose to sit on an alternative chair, symbolizing the end of the traditional monarchial system.
Other potential claimants include:
Jon Snow: Given his strong claim and the support of the North and the Vale, he might have become the rightful ruler. His refusal could lead to the throne passing to: Gendry: As a legitimized Targaryen descendant, Gendry may be a viable contender for the throne. Sweet Robin or Edmure Tully: These lords, who managed to survive and maintain their forces, could also claim the throne, drawing the support of other lords.Alternatively, the series may suggest a new era where the feudal structure of the Iron Throne is no more, and the entire system burns down with King's Landing. In this scenario, the High Lords of the Seven Kingdoms may declare independence, leading to a fragmented and decentralized power structure.
The collapse of the Iron Throne is not only a symbol of the end of an era but also the beginning of a new era. The destruction of the throne, along with King's Landing, marks the end of the age of feudalism and corruption, paving the way for a new, uncertain future.
The Legacy of ldquo;Game of Thronesrdquo;
The series ldquo;Game of Thronesrdquo; has left a lasting impact on popular culture, and its exploration of power, corruption, and the nature of leadership continues to resonate with audiences worldwide. The question of who will sit on the Iron Throne may never be definitively answered, but the impact of the show's message and its portrayal of power will continue to influence future storytelling and discussions about leadership and governance.