Unrelenting Critiques: Why Steven Seagals Career Deserves to Be Suppressed
Are You Ever Going to Watch a Steven Seagal Movie Again?
Introduction
Steven Seagal has been a prominent figure in action movies, but his career seems to be marred by a multitude of controversies and flaws. His recent support for Vladimir Putin has reignited discussions about his suitability as a role model in the entertainment industry. This article dives into why you might never want to watch another Steven Seagal movie, fueled by his past actions and controversial stances.
The Trounces Within Steven Seagal
Steven Seagal is not a figure to be taken lightly. On both the set and screen, his behavior and actions raise numerous red flags. Let's break down the reasons why he's not just a non-trademarkable agent of quality in the film industry.
Off the Screen Dishonesty and Bad Behavior
Misleading Claims: Seagal has a history of unfounded and questionable claims. For example, he once boasted about studying under Bruce Lee and teaching kickboxing to prominent figures like Anderson Silva. Both these claims are highly debated and backed by minimal evidence.
Self-Promotion: Seagal's tendency to self-promote has been a subject of ridicule. He's been known to engage in talk show appearances and interviews to further his career, often leading to embarrassing moments and lack of substance.
Manipulative Behavior: Seagal’s machismo and braggadocio have led to his conflicts with fellow martial artists. For instance, his first marriage to Kelly LeBrock ended due to his demands and bullying behavior.
Questionable Acting and Screen Performance
Incompetence: Seagal's acting skills are widely criticized. He frequently ruins dialogue, making his lines sound unnatural and out of place. His understanding of dramatic timing and comedic relief is virtually non-existent.
Physical Incompetence: Seagal's inability to perform physically demanding roles is evident. For example, he often avoids getting hit in fight scenes, which is a glaring indicator of his lack of authenticity and fear on screen. Additionally, his interactions with stuntmen can be quite dangerous; he has been accused of hurting stuntmen to make his movies look more realistic, while also firing stuntmen who try to make those scenes more authentic.
Illogical Movement: Seagal's portrayal of martial arts is often criticized for being overly choreographed and unrealistic. His movements often don't make sense and can look forced, detracting from the overall enjoyment of the film.
His Achilles Heel: The Gambino Reference
Seagal's character and reputation have been critically damaged by a well-known incident involving the Gambino Crime Family. According to FBI records, a secret recording showed that he could not hold his ground when confronted with genuine threats. This is a stark contrast to his on-screen tough guy persona. Unassuming men, without martial arts experience or resources, have shown more courage and resilience in similar situations.
The Final Straw: Putin's Support and Public Backlash
Seagal's recent endorsement of Vladimir Putin and his support for the invasion of Ukraine has sparked a wave of public backlash. His actions and opinions have resulted in him being considered persona non grata by many in the entertainment industry. This support has led to public figures and fellow actors taking collective action to boycott his work and even issuing threats of retaliation.
Conclusion: Seagal's Future in Film
The combination of Seagal's long-standing issues in the film industry and his recent support for Putin has made it highly unlikely that anyone would want to watch another one of his movies. The criticisms of his acting, claims of dishonesty, and controversial public stances have all contributed to a steady decline in his career. It's time to let Steven Seagal's legacy fade into the annals of bad taste, leaving fans of martial arts and action movies to search elsewhere for high-quality cinematic experiences.
(Note: The mention of "hit out on him" and "direct to video trash" are references to public actions against Seagal and his decline in quality of work, respectively.)