Unmasking Neoliberalism: The Rise of Post-Neoliberal Cynicism and Supra-Liberalism

The term neoliberalism has long been a buzzword, often blurred and misused by those opposed to free market capitalism. However, it is crucial to understand its historical roots and current interpretations for a clearer perspective of its future.

The Myth of Neoliberalism

Neoliberalism is a concept that has never truly gained traction in its full form. Coined by Milton Friedman in 1947, it was intended to describe advocates of free market capitalism. However, the term has since evolved and been misapplied to various groups and policies, causing confusion.

For some, a neoliberal is someone who once believed in socialism but had to acknowledge the superiority of capitalism. For others, it is a term used to describe individuals who still advocate for some form of government regulation and a welfare state. The term has become so varied and malleable that it is often used merely to confuse or discredit.

The Realities Behind the Term

The term has been used to label an array of individuals, from Milton Friedman and Paul Krugman to Barack Obama and George W. Bush. This versatility makes it a useless term in practical discourse, often serving to blur the lines between free market policies and government interventions that violate those markets.

The Future of Neoliberalism

While the term itself may never truly die, the ideology behind it will face significant challenges in the future. The main antagonists to neoliberalism will be post-neoliberal cynicism and the abuse of the further fringes of the neoliberal movement.

Post-neoliberal cynicism will be fueled by the perceived excesses and failures of the neoliberal policies. As these policies continue to face criticism for their widening economic inequality and social unrest, a new movement may emerge to counter them.

Beyond Neoliberalism: The Emergence of Supra-Liberalism

The rise of post-neoliberal cynicism will lead to a new political movement: Supra-Liberalism. This movement will work to restore the true values of liberalism, which have been overshadowed by the excesses of the neoliberal era. Supra-Liberalism will strive to address the shortcomings of both free market capitalism and excessive government intervention, seeking a balanced approach that prioritizes social equity and individual freedoms.

Supra-Liberalism may attract those who have previously identified as liberals but were disillusioned by the failures of neoliberalism. These individuals will demand a return to TRUE liberal values, emphasizing the principles of freedom, equality, and social justice.

Conclusion

The future of neoliberalism is uncertain, but its legacy will continue to shape political discourse. Post-neoliberal cynicism and Supra-Liberalism will emerge as a response to the perceived shortcomings of neoliberal policies, striving to create a more balanced and equitable society.

Understanding the evolution of neoliberalism and its potential opponents is crucial for navigating the complex world of modern politics. As we move forward, the terms and concepts we use to describe these ideologies will continue to evolve, reflecting the changing landscape of our society.