U.S. ARREST Failures: The Failed Pursuit of Justice Against President Trump

For many supporters of the January 6th insurrection trial, the failure to bring charges against former President Donald Trump remains a perplexing and deeply frustrating issue. This article delves into the reasons behind the lack of legal action against Trump, focusing on the involvement of Merrick Garland, the Justice Department, and the Supreme Court.

The Role of the Justice Department

The U.S. Attorney General, Merrick Garland, and the Department of Justice (DOJ) were criticized for their perceived lack of urgency in pursuing charges against Trump following the January 6th insurrection. They were accused of prioritizing minor figures before addressing the need to charge Trump and other high-ranking officials.

The following timeline highlights key issues:

January 6th, 2021: The insurrection occurred in which the U.S. Capitol was stormed, leading to violent clashes and the eventual certification of the 2020 election results. Initially, focus on minor figures: The Department of Justice first targeted individuals perceived to be of lesser importance, such as members of the crowd that stormed the Capitol. Lack of focus on Trump: It wasn't until the end of the Jan 6 Committee's investigation that the DOJ turned its attention to charging Trump and other high-ranking officials.

The Impact of Trump's Legal Strategy and Supreme Court

Trump's legal strategy was also a significant factor in the delays and lack of prosecution against him. He consistently appealed legal decisions, delaying any potential charges from reaching a court. This was further compounded by the Supreme Court's decision to grant him presidential immunity.

According to legal scholars and critics:

The Supreme Court's decision to grant Trump immunity was based on an interpretation of the Constitution that grants presidents complete immunity from criminal charges. This decision was controversial and is likely to be reconsidered in the future by lower courts. The Supreme Court delayed taking the case, and then delayed issuing a ruling until the current summer session, giving Trump more time to appeal.

Republican Supreme Court Judges and Their Influence

Three Republican-appointed Supreme Court justices, who were nominated by Donald Trump, played a critical role in delaying the prosecution of Trump. Their actions included:

Delaying the case: They delayed taking the case, giving more time for Trump's legal team to appeal. Delaying the ruling: They delayed issuing a final ruling, pushing the decision into the next summer session. Inventing Presidential Impunity: They invented a form of immunity not mentioned in the Constitution, creating a legal precedent that may be overturned in the future.

The Aftermath and Future Implications

These actions have significant implications for the future. According to legal experts, Trump could use his presidential immunity to dismiss all federal charges against him after he takes office. This means that:

The insurrection case and any other legal actions brought against him would likely be dismissed. This also means that the Florida documents case, which could have further exposed Trump's actions, may also be dismissed.

Supporters of the insurrection trials argue that the lack of charges is deeply unfair and a result of the U.S. justice system being biased in Trump's favor. They believe that:

Andrew Bryant Smith, the prosecutor, dismissed all charges because they were politically motivated against Trump. The failure to charge Trump sets a nefarious precedent for future presidents, allowing them to commit crimes while in power without fear of prosecution.

A key question arises: should President Biden use his own powers, including potential pardons, to address these issues? Critics argue that:

If Biden does not act, Trump will likely avoid further legal ramifications as president. The issue of Hunter Biden, who was also involved in potential legal actions, should be addressed, with many arguing that his actions were minor compared to Trump's.

This article has shed light on the complex web of legal and political factors that prevented the prosecution of President Trump. The question remains: how will these events impact U.S. politics and legal institutions in the future?