The Truth Behind the JFK Assassination: Debunking the Myths

The assassination of President John F. Kennedy remains one of the most contentious and debated events in American history. Many believe that the Warren Commission's findings, which concluded that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone, were manipulated to fit a preconceived narrative. Let us delve deeper into the evidence and counter-evidence surrounding the assassination to unravel the truth.

The Monstrous Blunders of FBI and Warren Commission

The FBI's role in the events leading up to and after the assassination cannot be overlooked. The bureau has a history of intimidating witnesses and destroying evidence. In cases such as the JFK TWA Flight 800, 9/11, and countless other events, the FBI has consistently tried to fit pre-ordained conclusions and manipulate evidence. This pattern of behavior casts serious doubt on the validity of the Warren Commission's findings.

Cherry-Picking Evidence and Political Manipulation

The Warren Commission investigation was fraught with convolutions and cherry-picking of evidence, leaving us with a murky understanding of the events. Similar to the Jan. 6th committee, the commission's report was tailored to fit a political agenda. The commission's findings were influenced by the political party affiliations of its members, leading to biased conclusions. In essence, the 1963 commission was a Democratic party-run theatrical operation, designed to align with their preconceived narrative.

Decoding the Misconceptions Surrounding Oswald

There are several misconceptions about Lee Harvey Oswald, which need to be addressed to gain a clearer understanding of the event. For instance, the belief that Oswald was a lone nut is contradicted by his prior contacts with the CIA and FBI. Additionally, the idea of Oswald being a Marine marksman who fired three shots from a crowded place is also disputed by evidence suggesting he was not present in the location at the time of the shooting.

Moreover, the claim that Ruby never met Oswald is also false. On the night of the assassination, Ruby, posing as a reporter, helped correct the Dallas District Attorney Henry Wade's misidentification of Oswald as a member of the Fair Play for Cuba Committee. This interaction reveals a deeper level of conspiracy and co-operation between Ruby and Oswald.

Theories Unveiling the Truth

The assassination of President Kennedy is a complex puzzle, and there are several theories that add color and depth to the narrative. For instance, the Newtonian Physics theory suggests that the assassination was meticulously planned and executed, with Oswald playing a significant, yet perhaps not primary, role in the event. This theory supports the idea that there were multiple shooters, rather than a single lone gunman.

Other theories include:

Oswald's involvement with the CIA and the Fair Play for Cuba Committee.

The connection between Oswald and George Sergius de Mohrenschildt, who was involved in getting Oswald the job at the Texas School Book Depository.

The possibility of Ruby being part of a larger conspiracy to protect someone or something, aligning with his alleged mistaken identification of Oswald.

The theory involving George de Mohrenschildt complexities the narrative, unearthing a possible web of CIA connections and Russian intelligence operations in the assassination. De Mohrenschildt's background as a former Russian diplomat and spy introduces the possibility that he may have been involved, if not orchestrating, the events leading to the assassination.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Warren Commission's findings that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone are deeply flawed and backed by little evidence. The assassination of President John F. Kennedy remains an enigma, clouded by misinformation and political manipulations. It is imperative to continue researching and reconsidering the factors that led to this tragic event to ensure a more accurate understanding of history.