The Truth Behind Bias in Indian Television Journalism

Journalism, at its core, aims to inform and educate the public. However, the reality in India is vastly different. When we examine the role of certain journalists, particularly Rajat Sharma from India TV, a troubling pattern emerges. This article delves into the issues of bias within Indian television and questions the credibility of journalists like Sharma and others who may stray from the path of journalistic integrity.

The Case of Rajat Sharma

Rajat Sharma, known for his television appearances on India TV, has garnered significant attention for his alleged bias. Unlike his peers, such as Barkha Dutta and Rajdeep Sardesai, Sharma is often labeled as the king of bias in Indian television.

One of the most egregious examples of Sharma's alleged bias was during the 2008 Mumbai attacks. While innocent lives were being lost, Sharma provided a platform for terrorists to voice their opinions on live television. This action, while potentially inflammatory, highlights a concerning lack of journalistic ethics and moral compass.

The Arushi Talwar Case: A Broader Pattern?

The Arushi Talwar case further exemplifies the troubling bias within Indian television. For three months, Sharma persistently portrayed the parents as the suspected killers, only to retract when it became clear they were innocent. This behavior prioritized TRP ratings and popularity over truth and justice, a stark betrayal of the journalistic duty to seek the truth.

Sharma's long history of alleged bias, betrayal, and fraud emphasizes a deep-rooted issue within Indian television journalism. Unlike other journalists, Sharma seems to defy the line between bias and journalistic integrity, highlighting a more severe problem than mere political favoritism.

Broader Context: The Lack of a Free Press in India

India's television landscape does not stand alone in this issue of bias. It is, unfortunately, a symptom of a larger problem: the absence of a truly free press. For decades, Indian journalism has been a tool used by those in power, rather than a force for transparency and accountability.

Historically, press freedom has been a casualty of Indian governance. Indians have faced censorship and limitations on free speech for generations. From 1947 to the present, India has been under the thumb of various leaders who have wielded control over the press to silence dissent and maintain power.

For instance, the 1975 Emergency under Indira Gandhi saw journalists and editors imprisoned and press columns went blank. The judiciary, known for toeing the line of the ruling party, further exacerbates this issue, with many judges allowing themselves to be swayed by alien ideologies and political pressures.

The Impact on Journalistic Integrity

The State has consistently prioritized power and governance over the rule of law and justice. This has led to systemic injustices, such as the theft of tribal lands and forests, and the strengthening of extremist ideologies.

The abrogation of fundamental rights, such as the right to a fair trial (Articles 20 and 21) and religious freedom (Articles 25 and 28), has further eroded the quality of journalism in India. Journalists, for the most part, mirror the biases and prejudices of those in power.

With rampant abuse of power and a lack of accountability, the media in India often serves the interests of the ruling class. This has led to a widespread lack of integrity and erudition among journalists, further fueling the cycle of misinformation and disinformation.

The Need for a More Vigilant Approach

In such a context, it is crucial for viewers to be skeptical and critical of the media they consume. While there are outlets like Mirror, WION, and The Guardian that offer some level of quality journalism, it is essential to cross-check and verify information across multiple sources.

Better to rely on social media and apply one's own judgment and discrimination, as there is no such thing as objective journalism. Social media platforms, while not infallible themselves, can serve as a tool for verifying and cross-checking information.

Truth seekers must adopt a healthy skepticism, and where necessary, a sense of cynicism. The 21st century is characterized by unaccountable "democracies," media corruption, and disinformation, making it imperative to be vigilant in seeking the truth.

Conclusion

The biases and irregularities present in Indian television journalism point to a systemic issue beyond simple political favoritism. It is a call for a broader cultural shift towards valuing truth, justice, and ethical journalism. Until we address the root causes of media corruption and disinformation, the integrity of India's press will remain in jeopardy.

Key Points:

British colonial legacy and its impact on Indian media Political and judicial control over media Systemic issues in Indian democracy and governance The need for critical and skeptical consumption of media Collaborative efforts for a free and fair press