The Strategic Logic Behind Not Assassinating the Arbiter in John Wick 3

After witnessing John Wick and Winston’s interactions with the Arbiter, it’s natural to question why they didn’t take the opportunity to neutralize the threat by shooting her. However, a closer look at the story’s narrative and strategic implications can explain the seemingly illogical decision. This analysis reveals the complex web of rules, strategy, and diplomacy that governs this criminal universe.

The Nature of the Arbiter

The Arbiter serves not as a personal enforcer, but as a symbolic figure who ensures the adherence to rules and regulations. Unlike a personal bodyguard, her role is strictly dictated by the higher authorities. Everything she does is governed by the rules and commands of a superior entity, referred to as the 'Table.' For example, her decision to seal the Continental and her punishments are not based on personal judgment but on the meticulous application of an established code.

Consequences of Assassination

The potential consequences of assassinating the Arbiter are profound and wide-ranging. For one, killing her would not halt the rules and regulations enforced by the Table. In fact, such an action would likely provoke an even more extreme and unpredictable response from the Table. If John or Winston had killed her, the Table could have taken more drastic measures, such as razing the Continental to the ground or deploying other means of retaliation. The loss of one Arbiter would signal weakness and could embolden the Table to escalate their actions.

Strategic Negotiation and Diplomacy

By not killing the Arbiter, John and Winston maintained the possibility of negotiating with the Table. The Arbiter’s presence served as a form of leverage, providing a neutral negotiator who had already witnessed the duo's capabilities. Her role as a mediator prevented the situation from becoming a total war, as it indicated a willingness to engage in dialogue rather than declaring an all-out conflict.

Preserving the Known Enemy

Keeping the known Arbiter in place also ensured that John and Winston would not face an unknown or potentially more dangerous figure. The Arbiter was a familiar variable, making it easier to predict and control the situation. By eliminating an unknown quantity, they could have exposed themselves to even greater risks, including the possibility of being replaced by a more resilient or cunning agent.

Moreover, the Arbiter symbolized the Table's position as the reigning authority in the criminal underworld. Taking her out would have been a powerful symbolic act, but it could also have backfired, leading to a more hostile response. The criminal universe's leaders possess immense power and resources, and such an act would certainly raise suspicions and fears among the other players.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the decision not to assassinate the Arbiter in John Wick 3 was not an error but a well-thought-out strategic choice. It allowed for continued negotiation, minimized potential escalations, and maintained the balance of power within the criminal universe. The strategic logic behind this decision underscores the intricate nature of the criminal code and the delicate balance of power within the film's narrative.