Why was Tyrion Lannister Appointed as Hand of the King Despite His Dwarfism and Physical Weakness?

The Game of Thrones series presents a complex narrative that often intertwines politics, family dynamics, and personal ambition. One such intricate plot point involves the appointment of Tyrion Lannister as the Hand of the King, a position he was assigned despite being a dwarf and physically weaker than his brother Jaime Lannister. This decision, though seemingly counterintuitive, had significant strategic and historical underpinnings beyond mere personal assessment.

The Context of the Hand of the King Position

The Hand of the King is a highly prestigious and influential position, responsible for overseeing the administration and governance of the realm. It is a position that holds immense power and trust, especially during times of turmoil. The character of Tyrion, despite his physical limitations, proved to be a capable and strategic thinker, making him an ideal candidate for this role.

Why Jaime Lannister Was Unavailable

The simple yet crucial reason for Jaime’s inability to fulfill the Hand of the King role lies in his current deployment. At the time, Jaime was leading the siege of Riverrun, a significant military operation that couldn't be paused or abandoned. This absence left the position vacant, and Tyrion was the only viable alternative.

The Legal and Ethical Considerations

The Kingsguard, a select group of elite defense knights, holds a unique and sacred vow: to take no titles or wives and to remain loyal to the king. This vow is critical, as it ensures the Kingsguard's neutrality and their ability to support the Crown without personal interests. Jaime’s membership in the Kingsguard posed a direct conflict with the Hand of the King position, a title that theoretically holds a noble title. Tyrion, on the other hand, was not a member of the Kingsguard, making him an ideal candidate for the role. His dwarfism and physical weakness, while present, did not render him incapable of performing the duties of the Hand.

Tywin Lannister's Strategic Insight

Tywin Lannister, Tyrion’s father, understood the nuances and complexities of the Lannister family’s strategic interests. Robert Baratheon's earlier and less prudent decision to bestow titles on Jaime, thereby violating his Kingsguard vows, set a precedent. Tywin did not make the same mistake, knowing that swearing to 'take no titles' prevented Jaime from holding the Hand of the King position.

Furthermore, Tywin saw the advantage in appointing a capable political and administrative figure like Tyrion. Tyrion’s political acumen and ability to navigate the treacherous waters of power politics were far more valuable for the strategic interests of the Lannister family. Jaime, though a skilled swordsman and military leader, was not as adept in the arts of diplomacy and court politics.

Alternative Candidates and Tywin’s Long-term Plans

Considering the available alternatives, Ned Stark, despite his noble character and strong position as Warden of the North, was not a viable candidate. Ned’s loyalty and integrity were admirable, but his lack of political experience and his ties to House Stark made him an unlikely choice for a role that required the delicate balance of power and loyalty.

Within the Lannister family, Kevan Lannister and his sons were also not ideal. Kevan, a trusted advisor, might have been too conservative for the turbulent times, while his sons lacked the necessary political experience. Similarly, Tommen Lannister was an infant at the time, and his presence could have been problematic.

Therefore, Tyrion became the most logical and strategic choice. Tywin likely saw in Tyrion a chance to assert his will over the Lannister family, ensuring that his dynasty continued in line with his long-term plans. Even if given the chance, Tywin would likely have attempted to remove Jaime from the Kingsguard and reinstate him as heir, but the immediate need to handle the Hand of the King position led to the appointment of Tyrion.

Conclusion

The appointment of Tyrion Lannister as the Hand of the King was a multifaceted strategic decision, driven by political, legal, and familial considerations. His appointment, while seemingly a step taken out of necessity, showcased Tywin Lannister's shrewd and strategic thinking. Tyrion's role proved to be far more than just a nominal position, and his tenure was marked by significant contributions to the Lannister family's continued dominance in Westeros.