The Silly Moments in Avengers: Endgame and Unchecked Plot Holes

While Avengers: Endgame is widely celebrated for its intricate narrative and emotional depth, there are a few moments that stand out as particularly questionable from a storytelling and plot consistency perspective. This article delves into what I consider the most ridiculous moments, and the plot holes that might have been avoided with a bit of foresight.

1. Tony's Time Traveling Conundrum

Tony inventing time travel in one night. It's a hallmark of Marvel's storytelling to set up little clues across its films and use them to explain intricate plot points later. In Iron Man 3, we see the Extremis virus possessing Tony's arm, which seems like more than just regenerating limbs. Marvel could have taken this opportunity to plant a seed for time manipulation, a key component of Endgame.

For instance, Tony could have realized that Extremis was capable of compressing or altering time, similar to the way the Stones manipulate it in Endgame. This idea aligns perfectly with the scientific and cosmic themes Marvel often explores.

2. Thanos and the Gauntlet's Energy Conundrum

Thanos wearing the Gauntlet and its energy surge. In Avengers: Endgame, whenever Thanos wears the Gauntlet, it generates a surge of energy. This implies that the energy produced by the Gauntlet is a critical component of its ability to execute the Snap. Yet, when Tony attempts to remove the Stones, Thanos should have noticed the energy loss immediately, as his body would no longer be being surged.

The fact that Thanos allows Tony to remove the Stones before seizing the opportunity to overpower him is a clear example of plot inconsistency. This inconsistency highlights the need for more careful planning and foreshadowing to maintain the story’s internal logic.

3. The Pyrokinetic Particles Paradox

Pyrokinetic particles and the Avengers' limited supply. The Avengers had a limited supply of Pyrokinetic particles, which allowed them to travel through time. However, when 2014 Thanos acquires the particle from Nebula, he is able to bring his entire ship and army through time. This raises several questions and inconsistencies:

Availability of particles: How did Thanos have enough particles to bring his entire army, while the Avengers were rationing their supply? Consistent use of resources: Why was the Avengers’ knowledge of limited particles not communicated to 2014 Nebula, who knew that they could only use the ship due to their limited supply? Character reactions: Tony Stark should have flown into a rage and questioned why Thanos had taken the particle and used it so recklessly. Given his personality, this would have made more sense than his lack of reaction.

4. Communication and Collaboration

Hidden sacrifices and miscommunication. In the Marvel Cinematic Universe, the situations often involve sacrifices and mysterious instructions, leading to frustration and miscommunication among the key players. In Avengers: Endgame, Nebula could have prevented some confusion by explicitly informing the Avengers of the sacrifices required on Vormir.

Similarly, Tony Stark, knowing the historical significance of the sacrifice, should have voiced his concerns and proposed an alternative plan. For instance, he could have suggested a better way to deal with the situation without causing further collateral damage.

Conclusion

While Avengers: Endgame is a masterpiece in many ways, these moments and plot holes serve as a reminder of the importance of meticulous planning and storytelling. By addressing these inconsistencies, Marvel could have provided a more seamless and satisfying experience for viewers.

Perhaps for future films, Marvel Studios might consider even more detailed and interconnected plot setups to ensure that every element fits together seamlessly, much like the Stones themselves.