The Questioning of Justice: Why Isn't the Government Accepting Vijay Mallya's Money?

In a recent development, Vijay Mallya, the notorious Indian businessman, has been directed by the Supreme Court to either pay Rs. 2000 or serve a 4-month jail term. However, the government's refusal to accept his money raises serious questions about justice and law enforcement in India. This article delves into the questionable actions of the judiciary and the banks, and explores why the government is not accepting Mallya's money.

Government’s Inaction and Banks’ Role

The government is not interested in accepting Mallya's money because they are more concerned about punishing him. The claims that banks asked Mallya to repay the money are misleading. It is the government that has declared these loans as due and payable. Banks will not accept his money unless he serves his jail term, as it is a necessity set by law.

It is striking how the people we elect to govern us often reveal their true nature when in power. The banking administration should remain friendly and cooperative while your loan is active. Once the loan is taken, they are quick to harass you. The employees of Kingfisher Airlines, Mallya's airline, were ready to let him go without pay. However, their primary goal was to punish him.

The Supreme Court's Role and Controversial Decisions

The Supreme Court's recent decision to direct Mallya to pay Rs. 2000 or serve a 4-month jail term is controversial. It is puzzling why such a decision was made, especially considering Mallya's current international status, as he is not even in the country. This decision brings to light several concerns, including the judiciary's actions and the overall fairness of the legal system.

1. **Encouraging Fraud and Corruption**: The Supreme Court's directive appears to be encouraging fraudulent and corrupt behavior. It sets a dangerous precedent for young businesspeople, making them idolize Mallya and his actions. This has a negative impact on the belief in the judiciary system among the youth.

2. **Injustice and Inequity**: Why is there such a disparity in judgment? Poor and innocent individuals who have yet to be proven guilty serve long prison terms, while wealthy businesspeople like Nirav Modi, Mehul Choksi, and Vijay Mallya get away with it. They are enjoying their luxuries while the public funds they looted are being wasted on frivolous activities.

Conclusion and Impact on the Country

The actions taken by the government and the judiciary regarding Vijay Mallya's money raise several questions about the integrity of the legal system in India. It highlights the need for transparency and accountability in the enforcement of laws. Citizens and law enforcement agencies must be more vigilant to ensure that the judicial system works as it should.

The recent cases involving prominent figures such as Kunal Kamra and the judiciary's stance should serve as a wake-up call for all to be attentive and smart. The message behind the ongoing debates is clear: to succeed in this country, one must resort to dishonesty and corruption. This is a deeply troubling trend, and it will certainly have long-term consequences for the country's future.

Keywords

Justice, Vijay Mallya, Government Inaction, Bank Loans, Judicial System