The Philosophical Points Behind Joker: A Societal Criticism Analysis

Summary: In this article, we explore the philosophical points that the movie Joker tries to convey. By analyzing the character of Arthur Fleck, his struggles, and his transformation, we will uncover the deeper meaning and societal critique present in the film. We will also discuss the aspects of mental health, societal exclusion, and the concept of being labeled as a joke when one is not worthy of recognition.

The Rise and Fall of Arthur Fleck

Joker, directed by Todd Phillips, presents a profound narrative that delves into the struggles of Arthur Fleck (played by Joaquin Phoenix), a mentally ill comedian who descends into darkness. This film not only delves into the personal journey of Fleck but also serves as a scathing critique of societal institutions and individual character.

Mental Health and Society

Arthur Fleck, originally portrayed as a normal guy wishing for a happy life, is a reflection of the individuals who suffer from mental health disorders. His condition of uncontrollable laughter, which initially annoys those around him, is later recognized as a symptom of his illness. The film raises crucial questions about the societal understanding and acceptance of mental health issues.

The opening scene introduces Arthur Fleck as a man branded by society, dressed in a clown costume, and engaged in an advertisement banner outside a market. His life is characterized by constant bullying and loneliness. Despite his dysfunction, he aspires to become a stand-up comedian, highlighting his desire for a better life. Unfortunately, societal pressures and personal challenges push Arthur Fleck to the brink, leading to his transformation into the infamous Joker character.

Societal Exclusion and the Social Contract

The film critically examines the social contract that binds members of society and the responsibilities of those in power. Just as Arthur Fleck is mistreated and excluded due to his mental illness, he finds himself at the mercy of societal structures that fail to provide real support. His mother's abandonment and the treatment received by Thomas Wayne, the face of the Batman persona, further illustrate society's inability to recognize and address the needs of those who are marginalized.

A significant moment in the film occurs when Arthur Fleck shoots the three men on the train. This act is a depiction of how societal values and moral judgment can be skewed, with the acknowledgment from the Wayne character that Joker is an evil entity, despite the victims being wrong and the perpetrator being wronged. This twist underlines the paradoxical nature of societal judgment and the complexity of moral ethics.

The Concept of Being a Joke

Arthur Fleck's transformation into Joker is not merely a result of his own choice but is a product of societal exclusion and the dehumanization of individuals. The society labels Arthur as a joke, emphasizing his worthlessness and disposability. The film explores the concept of being treated as an outsider and the consequences that follow, such as his violent response to being repeatedly dismissed and demeaned.

One pivotal quote from the movie, "When you treat someone in society as a joke, you become a Joker," runs through the film. This line encapsulates the central conflict of the movie – the struggle of an individual against layers of societal injustice and the dehumanizing effects of such environments.

Conclusion

While Joker does not explicitly denote a philosophical thesis, it offers a rich narrative that critiques the social structures and norms that lead to the mental breakdown and radicalization of marginalized individuals. The story of Arthur Fleck provides a powerful illustration of the human cost of societal neglect and the consequences of pathological exclusion.

In summary, Joker is not just a tale of an individual's descent into villainy but also a profound commentary on the psychological and social factors that drive such transformations. It raises critical questions about mental health, societal exclusion, and the ethics of moral judgment, urging viewers to reflect on their roles within the larger social framework.