The Name of the Monster in Frankenstein Revisited
Introduction
In Mary Shelley's seminal novel Frankenstein, the creature created by Victor Frankenstein is one of the most memorable and enigmatic characters. However, a frequent question that arises is, if the creature is not explicitly named, what is the proper term to refer to it?
The Creature's Lack of a Name
Interestingly, the name of the monster or creature in the original text is not given. In the novel, it is simply referred to as the "creature" or "monster." This lack of a formal name aligns with the creature's existential state—it is an unnamed being, created through a process that denied it the humanity it sought.
Victor Frankenstein, the creator, also contributes to the creature's anonymity. In the novel, Victor expels the creature and both physically and psychologically disowns it, ensuring that the creature is never given a name by its creator. This absence of a name underscores the creature's marginalization and otherness within the narrative.
The Term "Frankenstein's Monster"
Literally, the most common term used to refer to the creature is "Frankenstein's monster." This name is a direct result of its creation and the relationship between the creator and the creature. It reflects the sense of ownership and exclusion that the monster experiences within the narrative. In some adaptations and retellings, the creature may be called "Frankenstein’s creature," which further emphasizes its position as a creation without a proper identity.
Other Terms and Names Used in References
Various adaptations and interpretations of the novel have given the creature alternative names or described them differently. For example, in certain movies, the monster takes on the name of its creator, calling himself "Victor" in an ironic nod to his creator's first name. Other times, he might be simply referred to as "Frank."
The creature’s self-identification is particularly significant. At one point, he says to Dr. Frankenstein, “I am your Adam” – a reference to the first human in the Bible. This statement offers the creature a name for himself, albeit borrowed from the biblical narrative, which serves as a metaphor for his desired place in the world and his spiritual heritage.
Some adaptations even go so far as to give the creature a different name, such as "Adam" when he addresses Victor. This name choice can be seen as a spiritual or existential acknowledgment. However, it is important to note that these names are not in the original text but have been added for dramatic effect in certain revisions.
Conclusion
The lack of a specific name for the creature in Frankenstein is a powerful narrative device. It symbolizes the creature's rejection and isolation. Nevertheless, the creature has been given names in various retellings and adaptations, such as "Frankenstein's monster," "Frankenstein’s creature," or "Victor." Each term carries its own connotations and interpretations of the creature's identity and its relationship with its creator.
As a cultural figure, the creature remains a complex and important symbol, embodying themes of creation, identity, and the responsibilities of a creator. The very act of exploring these different names and identities provides a deeper understanding of the creature’s significance within the broader narrative of Frankenstein.