The Limitations of the International Community in Resolving the Israel-Palestine Conflict

The Israel-Palestine conflict has persisted for decades, despite the efforts of various international organizations, including the United Nations (UN). This article explores the challenges faced by global legal institutions in mediating this conflict and the potential reasons behind such limitations. We will analyze the role of the UN and its ties to organizations such as Hamas, the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), and the broader implications of this deadlock.

Why the UN Cannot Resolve the Conflict

The United Nations, as an influential global body, has a mandate to promote peace and facilitate international cooperation. However, in the case of the Israel-Palestine conflict, its actions and inactions have been questioned and criticized. Critics argue that the UN's structure and objectives prevent it from effectively resolving the conflict due to its biased stance against Israel.

Thrown Blame at the UN

Some critics, like the individual mentioned, argue that the UN was not created to address the shortcomings of its members. Instead, it is perceived as a platform for high salaries and protecting individuals such as former UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres. Guterres, a socialist from Portugal, is said to have been kicked off from the Portuguese government due to his unpopularity, leading some to question the neutrality and effectiveness of the UN.

Others argue that the UN's inability to mediate the Israel-Palestine conflict stems from its strong ties with organizations that are hostile to Israel. It is alleged that organizations such as Hamas and the PLO, which have explicitly vowed to destroy Israel, have influence over the UN's policies and decisions.

Explored Extremist Goals of Hamas and PLO

To understand the extent of the UN's limitations, it is essential to examine the founding charters of Hamas and the PLO, which outline their objective of genocidal actions against the Jewish people. Specifically, these organizations have stated their intentions to kill every Jewish person and destroy the ancestral homeland of the Jewish people, which is modern-day Israel.

The Genocidal Intentions of Hamas and PLO

The UN's inability to facilitate a peaceful resolution is directly linked to its history with these extremist groups. The close relationship between the UN and Hamas, as well as the broader implications of the PLO's charter, suggests that any resolution would be opposed by the UN if it permits the continued existence of Israel.

World War III and the Finality of the UN's Goals

Given the genocidal intentions of these organizations and their influence over the UN, a scenario where Israel is destroyed would be seen as a resolution to the Palestine-Israel conflict by the UN's "puppet master," Islamofascism. The goal of Islamofascism is to control all lands under Islamic dominion and ensure that no non-Muslims remain, as stated in the Quran. This belief in the inherent incompatibility of Islam and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights suggests that a final conflict (WW3) is imminent.

The Interests and Realities of the International Community

Another reason for the enduring conflict is the narrow interests of global powers. Many countries may publicly denounce Israel but privately benefit from its policies, such as the economy or strategic alliances. This hypocrisy is evident in the lack of direct intervention by any country, with the exception of Iran, which supports Hamas.

Limited Interference and Double Standards

International leaders often use rhetoric against Israel to appear strong and supportive of the Palestinian cause. Yet, in practice, they do not intervene or provide substantive help. The UN's failure to address the conflict reflects a broader political reluctance to take a stance that could upset the status quo or alienate key allies.

Ultimately, the international community's limitations in resolving the Israel-Palestine conflict are rooted in political allegiances, ideological biases, and the complex interplay of global interests. While the UN plays a crucial role, its effectiveness in mediating the conflict is compromised by its own structural limitations and its ties to organizations with genocidal intentions.