The Iron Throne's Moral Dilemma: Stannis Baratheon and the Fight for Justice

In the intricate web of conflicts and power struggles that define Game of Thrones, Stannis Baratheon stands out as a character whose unwavering commitment to justice and honor shapes his actions and decisions. As we delve into the implications of his moral stance, we explore the motivations behind his strategic choices and the challenges he faces in his quest for the Iron Throne.

The Myth of Tywin Lannister's Death

Cersei Lannister, Tywin’s daughter, attempts to sway public opinion by portraying the death of Tywin Lannister as a turning point in the struggle for the Iron Throne. However, this is a misnomer, as Tywin Lannister, while influential, was never destined to rule over Westeros. His children, too, lack the inclination or capability to take the throne, especially with Joffrey Baratheon alive.

Baratheon Legacy and Robb Stark's Claims

According to Cersei, the throne should pass to a Baratheon descendant since it was Robert Baratheon who was the last true king. This lineage, however, hinges on the assumption that Joffrey is a legitimate heir. With the arrival of the Starks and Sansa Stark actively accusing Joffrey of being a Lannister boy, the legitimacy of his claim is called into question. Stannis sees this as an opportunity to challenge Joffrey's rule by highlighting the illegitimacy of his birth.

A Character of Honor

Protik Roychowdhury succinctly encapsulates Stannis' moral code when he states that one word sums him up – honor. Unlike many other characters in the series, Stannis is a figure who refuses to bend his principles. When he rewards Davos for saving his life, he also brutally punishes him for the perceived betrayal in smuggling families out of Dragonstone. Despite his contempt for Davos, Stannis cannot be swayed by personal vendettas.

The Conundrum of Joffrey's Legacy

Considering Joffrey's possible breeding with Sansa Stark, Stannis' moral compass leads him to the conclusion that this child would not make for a legitimate ruler. Therefore, to ensure that the throne is passed on to a proper Baratheon, he must eliminate Joffrey. It is a stark reminder of the brutal reality that the throne is won by whatever means necessary, not just by right.

Stannis' Quest for Clean Conscience

As an anonymous answer points out, Stannis' actions are bound by a strict moral code. He would not kill Tywin Lannister because despite his danger, the act would go against his sense of justice. Even if he recognized the threat that Tywin posed, he would not have acted upon it due to his sense of right and wrong. This moral rigidity is what separates Stannis from other characters in the series who often engage in morally gray areas.

The Leech and Robb Stark

Stannis' unwavering sense of justice extends even to the symbolic act of the leech. When presented with the leech that represented Robb Stark's fate, he initially paused but ultimately agreed to the ritual because he saw Robb as another challenger to his rightful claim for the throne. This pause is a moment of moral complexity, but it ultimately serves to reinforce the rigid moral framework that guides his actions.

Conclusion: Stannis' Moral Imperative

In a world where survival often comes at the cost of morality, Stannis Baratheon stands as a figure who chooses to live up to his own high standards. His decisions, while sometimes shocking and bloodthirsty, are rooted in a deep sense of honor and justice. Whether his path leads to the Iron Throne or not, his unwavering commitment to his principles sets him apart and makes his actions deeply resonant for both the characters in the story and the audience.