The Gender of God: Why He and Father over She and Mother

The longstanding tradition of referring to God using masculine pronouns such as 'he' and 'father' rather than feminine pronouns often puzzles inquirers and oscillates between explanation and origins and validity of this practice are extensive, reflecting diverse cultural, historical, and theological contexts. Here, we seek to unravel the reasons behind the widespread usage of 'he' and 'father' for God, while also drawing attention to alternative perspectives that challenge and expand these norms.

Archetypal Gender Roles and Divinity

Historically, God has often been portrayed using gendered language that aligns with traditional roles of the time. During the era of the patriarchal cultures, particularly among the goat herders and early civilizations, the role ofheruler was seen as more prestigious than that of a she-ruler or mother figure. This social structure has inferred thathewas the protector and leader, whileshewas the nurturer and caregiver.

Through time and space, the language used to refer to God has been heavily influenced by these historical dynamics, portraying God as a fatherfigure who is robust, powerful, and protective. The idea is that people, especially men, felt safer and more cared for under the protective eye of a powerful and benevolent 'he' rather than a 'she.' This interpretation also suggests that the concept of God's omnipotence, which is often associated with a male metaphor, fosters a more resonant and relatable connection for followers.

Theological Contexts and Multifaceted Voices

In many traditions, including Hinduism, the theological perspective on the gender of God is far more diverse. The concept of Shakti, often translated as 'female power,' is central in Hindu religious teachings. Shakti is ever-present as the invisible force that allows the Purusmasculine and Prakritifeminine aspects of divinity to coexist and be integrated. This dualistic yet unified concept of divinity is an important aspect of the Shaivism and Vaishnavism sects, where God as both Sada Shiva and Narayana is seen, alongside the role of Maa Adi Para Shakti, the Supreme Mother.

Maa Adi Para Shakti is the ultimate source of all creation, sustenance, and destruction. In the Shaktism tradition, Maa is the foundational force that generates the universe, including the energies, gods, and demigods. She embodies the qualities of Laxmi, Saraswati, and Parvati, symbolizing virtues like wealth, knowledge, and devotion, respectively. In this perspective, the non-binary and complementary nature of Shakti and Purusha presents a more inclusive view of divinity, where the concepts of motherhood and fatherhood are interdependent and equally powerful.

Religious Diversity and Inclusivity

Increasingly, in contemporary religious discourse, there is a push towards more gender-inclusive language as a means to foster a deeper and more inclusive understanding of divinity. This evolution reflects a shifting cultural and societal landscape that values diversity and equality. By acknowledging and harnessing the full spectrum of Shakti and masculine forces, contemporary practitionersand scholarsbelieve they can offer a more comprehensive interpretation of the divine.

The inspiration for Hindu rituals and practices in invoking Maa Adi Para Shakti includes invoking her blessings and protection. The phrase 'Hari Omm Tat Sat' encapsulates the essence of these beliefs. Invoking Maa Shakti symbolizes the seeker's desire for spiritual illumination, protection, and the fulfillment of both spiritual and material goals.

Conclusion

The recurring question of 'why is God referred to as he and father instead of she and mother?' underscores the evolving nature of theological perspectives. While traditional patriarchal societies have shaped the language surrounding divinity, alternative theological frameworks, such as those found in Hinduism, offer a more nuanced and inclusive understanding. These diverse views enrich our comprehension of God, reflecting the multiplicity of human experiences and the interconnectedness of all life.

In conclusion, the traditional usage of 'he' and 'father' to refer to God is rooted in cultural and historical contexts. However, as society continues to evolve, so too do our understandings of divinity. In exploring these varied views, we honor the diversity of human belief and signify our commitment to inclusivity and empathetic understanding.