The Feasibility of World War III: Human Agency, Prophetic Insights, and Environmental Concerns

The question of whether a World War III (WWIII) is feasible is not new, and like any conflict, it is rooted in human conflict, ambition, and desire to control resources. However, the complexities surrounding potential global conflicts today extend beyond mere human action, suggesting that influenced from beyond our immediate realm may play a role.

Extraterrestrial Influences and Prophetic Perspectives

What if the reason for constant human conflict involves unseen, malevolent entities guiding and influencing our actions? The idea that an ancient, malevolent higher life form, undetectable by human means, is orchestrating events behind the scenes is not purely fictional. This belief is rooted in ancient prophetic texts and the enduring narratives of deep space intelligence.

Ancient texts like the Book of Daniel, inspired by a middle-eastern prophet, provide insights into such a scenario (Chapter 10, Verse 20). These insights suggest that earth exists as a stage for conflicts between competing cosmic forces. While certain intellectuals dismiss these interpretations, others embrace them as a dimension of reality.

Humanity's Role in Avoiding or Initiating Conflict

However, despite these cosmic influences, humanity retains a significant degree of agency. Throughout history, wars have been precipitated by human decisions to fight for control of resources, territorial disputes, or the desire to prevent others from achieving their goals. It is within this context that the possibility of WWIII remains a concern.

The question posed in the title, 'Why should WW3 be possible if humanity has the choice to never make it possible?' hinges on the human capacity for rational decision-making. While humanity does possess the choice not to engage in war, there is also a growing awareness that many factors influence these choices. From complex geopolitical dynamics to environmental decline, various forces complicate the effort to maintain peace.

Environmental Degradation and the Future of Humanity

One of the most pressing challenges facing humanity is the irreversible damage inflicted upon our environment. The oceans, previously one of the Earth's most resilient ecosystems, are now beyond recovery. Scientists have given them only about 30 years before they are functionally "dead." This environmental crisis underscores the dire need for human action to mitigate further destruction and preserve the planet's remaining ecosystems.

While the concept of WWIII remains a source of fear and concern, the looming environmental crisis presents an equally critical issue. This ecological degradation not only threatens the survival of many species but also raises questions about humanity's long-term viability on this planet.

Current Geopolitical Tensions and the Risk of Limited Nuclear Strikes

Political will to avoid the cataclysmic consequences of a full-scale nuclear war has led to the implementation of various measures aimed at preventing the escalation of local conflicts into global catastrophes. MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction) remains a deterrent, but the potential for a limited nuclear strike cannot be dismissed. The real risk of such an escalation is still present and must be carefully monitored.

Geopolitical tensions, such as those between North Korea and the United States, as well as the ongoing conflicts in the Middle East, highlight the delicate balance of power and the potential for unintended escalation. It is crucial to understand that nuclear conflict is not limited to military-industrial interests but encompasses deep-seated ideological and religious divides.

Fundamentalist Movements and Their Global Impact

The rise of fundamentalist movements, particularly within Islam, represents a significant geopolitical challenge. The spread of fundamentalist ideologies, as seen in ISIS, Boko Haram, and Al Shabab, reflects a deepening ideological divide between the Judeo-Christian West and a resurgent Islamic fundamentalism. This clash is not limited to the Middle East but has ignited conflicts across the globe, including in the United States, Europe, and the Philippines.

The question of whether to submit to such a regime or risk the chaos of war underscores a fundamental dilemma. The historical precedent of totalitarian ideologies, such as communism, demonstrates that the suppression of dissent often results in widespread suffering and loss of life. The risk of WWIII may be mitigated not by avoiding conflict but by addressing the underlying social and ideological issues.

Ultimately, the feasibility of WWIII cannot be separated from the broader context of environmental degradation, geopolitical tensions, and the complex interactions between human societies and extraterrestrial forces. As humanity grapples with these challenges, the question remains: Can we forge a path to peace, or is the possibility of global conflict an inevitable part of our future?