The FBI and DOJ Refusal to Answer Questions About January 6th Riot: A Closer Look

The question of whether FBI agents were involved in the riots on January 6th, 2021, has been a topic of much debate and speculation. The Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) have steadfastly denied any involvement, stating there were no FBI agents present during the insurrection. However, the lack of a clear statement and the refusal to answer questions raise more questions than they answer. This article delves into the possible reasons for this refusal and explores the potential implications.

Insane Speculation or Legitimate Concerns?

Those who suggest that FBI agents were involved in instigating or joining the riot are often met with derision. The idea that law enforcement would participate in such activities is both absurd and unrealistic. Critics argue that such claims are made solely by those with a vested interest in supporting former President Trump, and that any such involvement would be outrageous and unprecedented.

Who Benefited from the Riot?

The speculation about who the FBI might have been trying to help during the riot points to the political landscape surrounding the events. Many have highlighted the presence and influence of far-right figures, one of whom is often referred to as the "Orange Blob" or "Orange Julius," likely a reference to former President Donald Trump. Some argue that these figures could have used the chaos as a means to further their agenda and consolidate power.

National Security and Official Denials

The DOJ and FBI claim that their actions and omissions are rooted in national security concerns. They argue that if the truth were to come out, it could compromise ongoing investigations and potentially expose sensitive intelligence. This rationale has been criticized for being overgeneralized and does little to address specific concerns raised by the allegations.

Why Were Agents Not Called to Action?

Questions have also been raised about why the national guard was not called to ensure peace, and why former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi was deemed off-limits to contact. These points highlight the contradictory actions and complacency of the authorities during the events of January 6th.

Possible Explanations for No Answers

Given the eighteen months since the events of January 6th, we can now consider several possibilities:

Blatant Incompetence: It is possible that the FBI genuinely had no agents present. However, their presence in other situations, such as when defending Kyle Rittenhouse, complicates this theory. The intelligence gathered before the riot suggests that they were aware of the potential for such an event.

Useless or Inept Agents: Another possibility is that the FBI agents present were ineffective in preventing the riot. This could be due to a deliberate lack of action, which some suggest is part of a broader plan to empower federal authorities and target political opponents.

Provocation or Preparing for a New Insurrection: The third theory involves the FBI intentionally inciting the riot to leverage it as a means to strengthen federal power and create a new justification for government intervention. This fits with previous events, such as the plot to kidnap a Michigan governor in October 2020.

Conclusion

The refusal of the DOJ and FBI to answer questions about the involvement of FBI agents during the January 6th riot raises more questions than it answers. While the official stance suggests that no agents were involved, the lack of transparency and the continued speculation indicate that there may be more to the story. As we move forward, it is crucial to consider multiple explanations and continue to push for accountability and a thorough investigation.

Key Points to Consider:

Why there was no call for the national guard. Why Nancy Pelosi was deemed off-limits to be contacted. The potential role of the FBI in provoking the insurrection. Theories about the involvement of high-profile political figures.

The events of January 6th remain a contentious issue, and the continued questioning of the authorities' actions is essential to ensuring justice and accountability.