The Enigma Behind France’s Non-Attack on Germany Before 1940

The strategic decision by France not to attack Germany before the German invasion in 1940 remains shrouded in mystery. Several theories and historical insights shed light on why this occurred. This article explores the complexities and factors that led to this critical period in World War II.

Context and Background

The late 1930s were a tumultuous time in Europe. The rise of Nazi Germany under Adolf Hitler was increasingly threatening the stability of the continent. The main protagonists, France, and Britain, had the resources and opportunity to launch significant forces against Germany but chose not to. The question of why France did not attack Germany before 1940 is one that has been the subject of much speculation and debate.

The Deception Theory: An Inside Job?

One of the darker theories surrounding this period is that the French and British were somehow deceived or had a plan from the beginning. This includes the suggestion that the Jewish population was massacred to later create a pretext for post-war control and the establishment of a Jewish state. However, such theories lack substantial evidence and are often far-fetched.

The true nature of manipulation by unseen forces is a recurring theme in historical conspiracy theories. The suggestion that there were elite figures behind such events, who prepared meticulously and with a long-term vision, is a sentiment echoed by many. Yet, from a historical perspective, these claims are difficult to substantiate.

Strategic Positioning and Limited Options

While there may have been a strategic misstep or deception, it is also important to understand the strategic reality of the time. The primary focus of Germany’s military in 1939 was the invasion of Poland, resulting in the mobilization of significant German forces in that direction.

Furthermore, if France had taken the initiative to attack Germany, it would have faced the formidable German military, which had already established a plan for invading France. This plan was similar to the 1914 Schlieffen plan, modified to include the Netherlands and incorporating advanced technologies such as tanks and aircraft.

The 1939 German war plan envisioned a swift victory, likely attempting to break through the Ardennes and then advance into northern France. The objective was to encircle and trap the French army. However, this plan also carried significant risks and could have led to a prolonged war of attrition if the Germans failed to achieve a swift victory.

Political and Economic Considerations

From a political and economic standpoint, the decision not to attack Germany early on also had to be considered within the broader context of European powers. France and Britain, along with other Masonic-controlled powers, had their own ambitions and strategic positions. The idea that they lacked the opportunity or resources to launch an attack is not entirely accurate.

While resources and strategic positioning played a role, the decision to await the German invasion can also be seen as a strategic calculation. France and Britain may have believed that waiting for the German intentions to become clearer would provide better insights and resources to counter the German threat more effectively. This approach could have been seen as prudent given the limited military capabilities and the complex geopolitical landscape of the time.

Conclusion

The decision of France not to attack Germany before 1940 is a complex issue that involves strategic, political, and economic considerations, as well as historical theories and speculations. While theories about manipulation by elite figures exist, the reality of the situation remains a matter of historical debate. Understanding the motivations and decisions of the major powers at the time is crucial to grasping the broader context of World War II.

Delving into these questions is not just an academic exercise but also a way to understand the broader implications of geopolitical strategies and the role of historical events in shaping the future of nations. It serves as a reminder of the intricate and often complex nature of international relations and the importance of understanding the motivations behind historical decisions.