The Disappointing Journey of Thugs of Hindostan: A Review

Thugs of Hindostan, a film directed by and starring Aamir Khan, has recently been critically reviewed and found wanting. While it has the potential to be an action-adventure extravaganza, the film falls short in several aspects, making it one of Aamir Khan's worst performances in recent years.

Plot and Concept

The story begins in the late 1700s, where a conniving British Officer Clive takes the kingdom of Mirza, leaving behind only the young princess Zafira and her trusted guard Khudabaksh. Years later, they form a band of rebel pirates, fighting against the English officer and striving to reclaim their lost kingdom. The British company, unable to contest them, hires the wily thug Firangi, played by Aamir Khan, to track the gang and thwart their plans. This setup has the potential for an epic adventure, but the film struggles to live up to its grandeur.

Genre Expectations vs. Reality

Action, adventure, and fantasy are genres that often come to mind with Hollywood’s big-budget movies. So when a film like Thugs of Hindostan attempted to mirror such expectations, it was initially seen as a novel and exciting venture. However, the execution did not quite meet these lofty aspirations. Despite the high production values, which include top-grade action and stunning visuals, the writing and narrative prove to be subpar. The predictable plot progression and lack of surprises or twists render the film disappointing.

Historical and Cultural Considerations

The film's attempt to set itself in historical India during the British rule raises questions about its credibility. While the British domination is a factual historical event, the inclusion of pirates as the main antagonists does not align well with historical facts. It is important to note that the Indian context of pirates is not one that is well-known or recognized. In this context, Thugs of Hindostan fails to offer a truly authentic representation of the period.

Production Design and Visuals

In spite of the predictability of the story, the production design by Sumit Basu and the cinematography by Manush Nandan are noteworthy. These elements help to create a visually appealing film. However, the screenplay, written by Vijay Krishna Acharya, lacks the dynamism needed to carry the narrative forward. The storytelling becomes choppy, and the extended and overly dramatized scenes do not enhance the overall experience.

Musical and Acting Performances

The soundtrack by Ajay-Atul, while not a standout, fails to significantly contribute to the film's overall narrative. Regarding the performances, Aamir Khan and Amitabh Bachchan deliver enthusiastic and spirited performances, especially with their physical comedy and intense dialogue sections. However, the lack of cohesive performances from the rest of the cast impacts the film's overall appeal. Supporting actors like Katrina Kaif and Fatima Sana Shaikh are often left in less impactful roles with limited dialogue and action.

Length and Editing

Adding to the film’s shortcomings, its runtime of 2 hours and 45 minutes feels like overkill. The weak editing contributes to a clunky pacing that does not hold up the grand narrative. Despite the efforts put into creating visually engaging sequences, the emotional and narrative complexities are not adequately addressed.

Conclusion

Overall, Thugs of Hindostan fails to deliver the entertainment value one might expect from a film of its magnitude. While it has the potential to be a thrilling and engaging tale, its numerous flaws overshadow these aspects, leaving it in the shadow of Aamir Khan's previous works. The film falls short on many fronts, making it a less-than-satisfactory endeavor, both for Aamir Khan's fans and general viewers. For those looking for a festive season entertainment, it might leave them feeling underwhelmed.

Also See

More Critical Reviews of Indian Films