The Debate Over Star Trek: Discovery - Making of Sci-Fi Drama vs. Continuity

Since its debut in 2017, Star Trek: Discovery has been a subject of both elation and disappointment in the Star Trek fandom. Critics and fans alike continue to debate the merits and drawbacks of the show, particularly regarding its staunch adherence to the series' established canon. This article aims to explore the reasoning behind some of these criticisms and provide an objective analysis.

Introduction to Star Trek: Discovery

Star Trek: Discovery is a reboot series that seeks to introduce a new installment to the beloved science fiction franchise. It received significant attention due to its fresh perspective on the Starfleet universe, a blend of high-stakes adventure and emotional drama. However, the show also faced criticism for its divergences from the established canon.

The Case for Cynicism: Departure from Canon

One of the major criticisms directed at Star Trek: Discovery is its departure from the established canon. The show redefines key characters and plotlines, sometimes disregarding long-held beliefs and established timelines. Critics argue that this unrelenting shift from established lore disrupts the emotional and narrative continuity that fans have come to depend on.

Character Continuity Concerns

A prime example of this criticism centers around the character of Michael Burnham. Some argue that the show's decision to make her a secret sibling of Spock is unnecessary and a stretch. The show could have easily tied her into the existing continuity by depicting her as an adopted sister of Tuvok, who was present in the series Voyager. Tuvok was 109 at the start of Voyager, so he could have been an infant at the time of the events in Discovery. This would have provided a more cohesive narrative within the canon.

Plot and Dramatic Choices

Beyond the character arcs, the plot of Discovery has faced criticism for its dramatic approach. Some viewers argue that the show focuses too much on emotional beats and group hugging scenes without providing substantial plot development. Critics claim that the dramatic scenes are often contrived and not well-integrated into the overall storyline.

Lack of Coherence in Drama

The criticism extends to the emotional depth of the characters. It is argued that the characters often burst into tears without any clear reason, creating an artificial and unearned emotional response from the audience. This lack of depth undermines the show's attempts to build genuine human connections.

Alternate Continuity: A More Nuanced View

However, it is also argued that Discovery would be more forgivable if it were set in an alternate universe, where the unverifiable elements could be more easily chalked up to the show's alternative timeline. The show explicitly claims to be part of the same canon as Enterprise, Nemesis, The Original Series (TOS), The Next Generation (TNG), Deep Space Nine (DS9), and Voyager (VOY). This insistence on continuity causes many enthusiasts to question the show's choices and storylines.

profits and fan reception

While fan dissatisfaction can impact a show's profitability, Discovery managed to maintain a decent balance. Despite critiques, the show continued to attract a dedicated fanbase and was even praised for its visual effects and action sequences. However, this satisfaction does not negate the critical assessment of its narrative choices.

Conclusion: A Mixed Bag of Experiences

In conclusion, the debate around Star Trek: Discovery reflects the ongoing tension between adhering to established canon and creating a new and engaging narrative. Purists argue that the show strays too far from the established lore, while others see it as a necessary step in reinventing the Star Trek franchise. Whether or not Discovery lives up to the lofty expectations of its fans ultimately depends on one's tolerance for narrative innovation versus traditional storytelling.

Related Keywords

Star Trek Discovery, Sci-Fi Continuity, Drama in Star Trek, Star Trek Fan Criticism