The Crown and Queen Elizabeth II: Debunking Myths and Misconceptions

It's common to encounter thick, misguided Americans who believe that The Crown is a factual portrayal of the British monarchy. However, The Crown is, in fact, a work of fiction. This article aims to clarify some of the most prevalent misconceptions related to Queen Elizabeth II, particularly concerning her relationship with Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall. Let's explore the truth behind these myths.

Falsehood: Queen Elizabeth II Did Not Attend Camilla's 50th Birthday Because She Did Not Approve of Their Marriage

The notion that Queen Elizabeth II did not attend Camilla's 50th birthday due to her disapproval of their marriage is a piece of fiction perpetuated by The Crown. In reality, Queen Elizabeth II did not have an issue with their relationship. She even changed the law to allow Camilla to be known as "Queen Consort" after her death.

The Truth: Camilla Did Not Become Queen Through Charles's Influence

It is widely believed that Charles made Camilla the Queen. However, the truth is far from this. It was Queen Elizabeth II who changed the law, allowing Camilla to be addressed as "Queen Consort" after the monarch's passing. This decision was made to honor Camilla's long-standing partnership with Prince Charles and to ensure she would be recognized as such in the event of the monarch's death.

Addressing the Fictional Representation in The Crown

While The Crown may be engaging and informative for entertainment, it should not be taken as a documentary. It is a work of fiction that often takes creative liberties with historical events and characters. The series is a dramatization of Queen Elizabeth II's reign, and any factual inaccuracies should be understood as such.

Another Myth: Queen Elizabeth II Is Still Concerned About The Crown's Portrayal

It is suggested that Queen Elizabeth II is turning in her grave due to The Crown's portrayal. However, this is a complete fiction. Queen Elizabeth II, upon her release from her role as head of state, would no doubt be more than happy to relax. It is the writers and producers of the show who take liberties with the historical facts of her reign, and this should be addressed.

Conclusion

Queen Elizabeth II was a landmarks figure in British history, and The Crown is a significant part of the public's understanding of her reign. However, it is crucial to remember that the series is not a documentary. The true nature of Queen Elizabeth II's relationship with Camilla, and the decisions she made, should be celebrated in their historical context. It is time to set the record straight and separate fact from fiction.