The Controversy Surrounding Martin Sheen’s Robert E. Lee in 'Gettysburg'

The 1993 movie adaptation of Michael Shaara's novel 'Gone for Soldiers', titled 'Gettysburg', has been a polarizing piece of historical fiction. Among the many discussions surrounding the film, one of the most heated debates has centered around Martin Sheen's portrayal of the Confederate General Robert E. Lee.

Reception of Martin Sheen's Performance

While some audiences and critics praised Sheen's contributions to the film, his portrayal of Robert E. Lee has largely been met with mixed reviews. Many viewers appreciate the depth and gravitas that Sheen brought to the character, while others feel that his performance lacks authenticity and true portrayal of the historical figure.

According to reviews and audience feedback, some viewers felt that Sheen's performance was 'over the top' and a bit 'unconvincing'. This is exemplified by the observations that his accent was generic and that his portrayal lacked the emotional depth and animation expected of a commanding and charismatic leader such as Robert E. Lee.

Detached and Overacted? - A Controversial Interpretation

One critic pointed out that Sheen's portrayal often seemed too detached, despite efforts to maintain a stoic and cool demeanor. This interpretation suggests that the character's stoic nature was portrayed in a way that some viewers found distant or unnatural. Nevertheless, it is important to note that a polished historical drama requires a balance between authenticity and dramatic intensity, and the film 'Gettysburg' does aim to bring historical events to life.

Comparisons and Contrasts

Among the performances in 'Gettysburg', some stand out as particularly strong and resonant. For instance, Patrick Gorman's portrayal of Confederate General John Bell Hood was widely praised for its depth and intensity. Similarly, Jeff Daniels' interpretation of Joshua Chamberlain was also well-received, with many noting that he truly 'became' his character rather than 'acting' it.

Robert Duvall: A Superior Alternative

Comparisons with other actors, such as Robert Duvall, who played Robert E. Lee in the 2003 film 'Gods and Generals', are particularly telling. Many viewers and critics found Duvall's performance to be more authentic and more fitting of the historical Lee. His portrayal was noted for its subtlety and emotional depth, making him a more compelling and believable leader.

Personal Anecdotes Add Color to the Discussion

To add a more personal and human touch to the debate, anecdotes from persons involved with the production further enrich our understanding. For example, Bobbie, a bartender at the Farnsworth House Tavern, described Martin Sheen as one of the most 'nice and sweet' couples she had ever seen, even noting that Sheen tipped well. Conversely, she also mentioned that Beau Brinkman, who played Pettus Hill Longstreet, was a notable weakness in the film, possibly due to his erratic behavior off-set.

Another intriguing story revolves around Beau Brinkman. During the filming, he was reportedly partying, womanizing, and sleeping with every woman he could, despite being married to Melissa Gilbert. Melissa came to Gettysburg, confronted him in the basement of the Dobbin House Tavern, and reportedly 'kicked his ass'. These kinds of stories highlight the personal drama that can occur alongside the professional endeavor of making a film.

Final Thoughts

Art is subjective, and the portrayal of historical figures in films inevitably invites scrutiny and debate. While 'Gettysburg' remains a monumental work in American cinema, its enduring legacy is often a testament to the varying opinions it stirs. Whether one praises or criticizes Martin Sheen's performance, it's clear that his interpretation has become an integral part of the film's cultural impact and the broader discourse on historical representation.