The Complex Dance of Law and Order in Delhi: Arvind Kejriwal and Narendra Modi

Introduction

Delhi, the capital of India, is a city that is at the heart of political and administrative discourse, especially when it comes to law and order. Two key figures in this arena are Arvind Kejriwal, the Chief Minister of Delhi, and Narendra Modi, the Prime Minister of India. The relationship between these two leaders is often characterized by strategic maneuvers and political posturing, with Kejriwal frequently involving Modi in discussions about the law and order in the capital. This article delves into the reasons behind Kejriwal's persistent efforts to draw Modi into these discussions, examining the political motivations and strategic implications of such actions.

Central Government Authority

Delhi is a unique union territory with its own legislative assembly, but the central government wields significant control over law and order through the Delhi Police. This central role often leaves the Delhi government feeling sidelined and overshadowed. Kejriwal frequently argues that the central government, led by Modi, should take a more proactive role in addressing policing and security issues in the capital. By involving Modi, Kejriwal aims to shift the responsibility for law and order from the local to the central government, asserting that the center should play a more active part in addressing these crucial issues.

Political Accountability

A central strategy of Kejriwal is to hold the central government accountable for any failures in maintaining safety and security in Delhi. By engaging Modi in discussions about law and order, Kejriwal seeks to draw attention to the central government's role in these matters. This not only highlights the central government's responsibility but also deflects potential criticism of the Delhi government's inability to manage law and order effectively. Through this approach, Kejriwal hopes to gain public sympathy and support, thereby increasing his political standing.

Public Attention and Media Coverage

Bringing Modi into the conversation is a savvy move that can attract significant media attention and public discourse. Kejriwal understands the power of public opinion and uses this strategy to highlight specific issues or failures related to law enforcement in Delhi. By framing the narrative around the central government's perceived inadequacies, Kejriwal can shift the focus away from his own government, allowing him to present himself as a more proactive and responsible leader.

Inter-Governmental Relations and Autonomy

The contentious relationship between the state and central government provides Kejriwal with a platform to advocate for greater autonomy for the Delhi government. By involving Modi in these discussions, Kejriwal can leverage the central government's influence to push for reforms that would give the Delhi government more control over its affairs. While the central government's intervention in law and order is necessary, Kejriwal sees this as an opportunity to promote a more cooperative and less paternalistic relationship between the two governments.

The Motivation behind Kejriwal's Actions

Kejriwal's efforts to involve Modi in discussions about law and order are often seen as a strategic move to address governance issues and seek accountability. However, it is also important to understand the underlying motivations of these actions. Part of the reason for Kejriwal's persistence in involving Modi is a desire to save himself from political difficulties. By pushing the central government to take a more active role, he can deflect blame and shift public focus away from his own shortcomings.

Perception and Image Management in Politics

Politics is often not a selfless act. While there may be politicians who genuinely pursue public interest, the majority engage in activities driven by a desire for recognition and personal gain. Success in politics does not solely depend on performance but on the perception of that performance. Similarly, maintaining a strong public image is crucial for political success. For instance, the current government may claim lower headline inflation, but this is often due to external factors rather than policy-driven success.

Modi vs. Kejriwal: The Battle for Perceived Image

When it comes to Kejriwal and Modi, the perceived image of Modi is often better than his actual performance on the ground. Modi's charisma and public image can be likened to the legendary Steve Jobs, who was able to sell nearly anything to the masses. Kejriwal, on the other hand, has been tirelessly fighting to maintain the public's perception of Modi as a champion of the people. However, Kejriwal's efforts are not about providing solutions but about creating a narrative that exposes perceived shortcomings of the existing government.

Comparison to the Corporate World

The world of politics can be compared to the corporate world, where both Modi and Kejriwal are egomaniacs seeking to enhance their public image. Modi is seen as a seasoned player, while Kejriwal is still a learner. Both leaders often take the course that is approved by the masses. While Kejriwal sees himself as the underdog fighting against a more powerful entity, it is clear that he is using this narrative to gain political leverage. Just as we often feel sympathy for the weak in the corporate world, Kejriwal uses the public's desire for a fairness narrative to his advantage.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the relationship between Arvind Kejriwal and Narendra Modi in the context of law and order in Delhi is a complex and multifaceted one. Kejriwal's strategic use of Modi in discussions about law and order serves multiple purposes, including addressing governance issues, seeking accountability, and influencing public opinion. Understanding these dynamics provides valuable insights into the intricacies of Indian politics and the roles of different political figures in shaping the narrative around law and order.