The Bias Against Andrew Yang, Tulsi Gabbard, and Bernie Sanders on MSNBC

MSNBC is often accused of bias, but the extent to which it allegedly undermines and ignores some Democratic candidates is more significant than many realize. This article delves into why Andrew Yang, Tulsi Gabbard, and Bernie Sanders are often overshadowed or marginalized on the network.

Why MSNBC’s Bias Against These Candidates Is Not Just Alleged

The argument that MSNBC is a mouthpiece for the Democratic Party is not just a casual observation. The network has been accused by critics of actively working against candidates like Andrew Yang, Tulsi Gabbard, and Bernie Sanders, whose stances and policies are perceived as disruptive to the party’s main strategic priorities.

The Strategic Importance of MSNBC

MSNBC's influence goes beyond mere reporting—it functions as a propaganda tool for the corporate and military-industrial complex, which is closely aligned with the Democratic Party's leadership. This network of power structures seeks to diminish threats to its commercial and foreign-policy interests, making candidates like Sanders, Gabbard, and Yang, who represent such threats, targets for media bias.

Questioning MSNBC's Bias Against Specific Candidates

Some critics argue that the bias is not a universal phenomenon across all media channels. Fox News, for instance, is often criticized for its right-leaning stance, but there is a lack of concrete evidence to suggest similar silence from other networks regarding candidates in the Democratic race. The main issue seems to be that Yang receives less coverage due to his low polling numbers, while Bernie, paradoxically, receives more media attention than he warrants.

Unimpeachable Honesty and Integrity

Andrew Yang, Tulsi Gabbard, and Bernie Sanders are lauded for their unimpeachable honesty and integrity. These traits are not typically associated with the kind of media bias that characterizes MSNBC. The network's disdain for these qualities suggests a deeper ideological conflict rather than mere reporting.

The Scope and Extent of Media Bias

Internal documents and consistent patterns in reporting suggest that MSNBC's bias extends far beyond isolated incidents. There are frequent and significant errors in reporting poll results for candidates like Sanders and Yang, which are often underreported, while other candidates are inaccurately overrepresented. This pattern cannot be attributed to mere coincidence and suggests a deliberate attempt to shape public perception.

The Demands of Modern Media

With a vast number of Democratic candidates competing for attention, combined with the desire to counteract the significant media time that President Trump occupies, there simply is not enough airtime to cover everyone impartially. This is particularly challenging for candidates like Yang, Gabbard, and Sanders, whose issues are often more niche and less likely to gain mainstream traction.

MSNBC does have a responsibility to present a range of voices and viewpoints. However, the current coverage patterns suggest a significant gap in this regard, leading to an uneven playing field for these candidacies.

In conclusion, while MSNBC cannot exist without a connection to the Democratic Party, the extent to which it perpetuates bias against candidates like Andrew Yang, Tulsi Gabbard, and Bernie Sanders goes far beyond mere party affiliation. It is a systemic issue that requires scrutiny and reform to ensure fair and balanced journalism.