Steven Moffat vs. Russell T. Davies: A Close Look at Their Contributions to Doctor Who

The writers Steven Moffat and Russell T. Davies have each left distinct and indelible marks on the show Doctor Who. Their unique approaches to storytelling have shaped the series in different ways, sparking ongoing debates among fans about who is the better writer.

Steven Moffat: Complex and Clever Storytelling

Steven Moffat is often praised for his complex and clever storytelling, particularly during his tenure as a writer for Doctor Who. His episodes, such as The Empty Child/The Doctor Dances, The Girl in the Fireplace, and Blink, showcase intricate plot lines and multi-layered narratives that challenge the audience's analytical thinking.

However, Moffat's intricate storytelling often comes at the expense of viewer buy-in. His over-reliance on convoluted plot lines can sometimes detract from the emotional depth of the characters. For instance, he occasionally creates throw-away incarnations of the Doctor when it suits his narrative, which can leave some fans feeling unsatisfied. This approach can be seen as a compromise between crafting a compelling story and maintaining the character's consistency.

Russell T. Davies: Emotional Depth and Character Development

In contrast, Russell T. Davies is celebrated for bringing emotional depth to the show, elevating it beyond the typical sci-fi narrative for teenage boys. His focus on real emotional connections between characters and the Doctor has been a hallmark of his contributions to the series. Davies was particularly successful at writing stand-alone episodes, proving his ability to tell a compelling story even when he had limited material to work with.

Davies was a skilled director and an alright writer, but his shows were bolstered by the presence of great actors, which allowed for a more engaging and emotionally resonant viewing experience. His attention to character development and the exploration of diverse themes set a new standard for the show, making it more relatable to a broader audience.

Both Writers Have Their Strengths

While Steven Moffat and Russell T. Davies have their respective strengths, it is easy to appreciate each for what they contributed to the show. Moffat's complex storytelling and clever sci-fi constructs, such as avoiding silly tropes like farting aliens, are highly valued by many fans. On the other hand, Davies' focus on emotional depth and character development made the show more accessible to a wider audience.

Ultimately, the best Doctor Who has been when Russell T. Davies was running the show and Steven Moffat was writing for it. Their collaborative efforts have pushed the boundaries of the series and brought new dimensions to the classic characters, enhancing their appeal in the process.

When it comes to the question of which writer is the better, it seems that the answer lies in their respective roles within the show. Moffat excels in crafting intricate, thought-provoking narratives, while Davies excels in fostering deep emotional connections and character development. Their combined strengths make for a more compelling and diverse viewing experience.

Both writers have demonstrated a good grasp of what can make Doctor Who work, with their strategies complementing each other. Moffat's clever sci-fi and Davies' emotional depth have created a show that is both intellectually engaging and emotionally resonant.