Star Wars Plot Holes: Who Made the Messiest Sequel?
Star Wars Plot Holes: Who Made the Messiest Sequel?
When it comes to Star Wars movies, the series is known for its rich mythology, epic adventures, and groundbreaking visuals. However, behind the magic lies a fair share of plot holes, especially in the sequels. In this article, we will delve into which Star Wars film is often criticized for having the most plot holes and why. So, grab your lightsabers and let's explore!
1. J.J. Abrams and the First Sequel
The Star Wars: The Force Awakens (2015) is the first major addition to the Star Wars saga since the original trilogy. Directed by J.J. Abrams, known for his use of magical realism and pop culture references, the film set the stage for a new era. While the visuals and action were a treat, some viewers were left questioning the narrative choices.
Plot Holes in 'The Force Awakens'
Time Travel Continuity Issues: Rey, a young Force-user, begins her story as a foundling but quickly discovers clues pointing to her past. The timeline inconsistencies with Luke Skywalker's own past were confusing, leading many to question how exactly Rey knew about Luke. Han Solo's Speakeasy: Holographic technology in the film allowed the characters to interact in seemingly impossible locations. The Speakeasy bar, where the famed Millennium Falcon is famously hidden, sparked debates on how such advanced technology was possible in a universe regulated by the First Order. Ben Solo’s Force Blast: In a heated confrontation, Kylo Ren (Kylo Ren's Force stash was tampered with by Snoke, and he finds a way to use it to destroy a ship. The sudden and unexplained ability to perform such a powerful Force blast raised eyebrows, given the film's emphasis on controlling the Force.Did J.J. Abrams Think Logic Was Understadn?
J.J. Abrams, known for his love of cool explosions and lens flares, sometimes opted for spectacle over story logic. While some might argue that these visual elements enhanced the overall experience, others felt that the deviation from established lore and continuity caused inconsistencies. As he himself mentioned, his priority was creating adrenaline-pumping moments rather than ensuring plot coherence.
2. Ryan Johnson and the Second Sequel
The Star Wars: The Last Jedi (2017), directed by Rian Johnson, marked a seismic shift in the series. With a narrative that tackled themes of family and legacy, the film built on the foundations laid by The Force Awakens. However, some loyal fans and critics alike found the plot threadbare and poorly constructed.
Plot Holes in 'The Last Jedi'
Lightsaber Training and Advanced Skills: Rey's sudden acquisition of advanced Force skills and lightsaber combat prowess was jarring. Given her inexperience at the beginning, it was hard to accept the rapid progression of her abilities. Logistics of the Battle of Crait: The Battle of Crait showcased spectacular action, but questions arose about the logistics of the battle. How could a small group of rebels hold off the might of the First Order without outside assistance? The Death of Luke Skywalker: One of the most controversial elements was the apparent death of Luke Skywalker. The revelation and its circumstances were often seen as rushed and unsatisfying, clouding the emotional payoff of Rey's training.Forgetful Coherence or Artistic Choice?
Rian Johnson, known for his dramatic and poignant storytelling, sometimes favored intense emotional beats over plot coherence. While the film's exploration of complex themes was well-received by many, the lack of attention to detail in certain sequences led to significant plot holes. Johnson's attempts to craft a nuanced narrative sometimes fell short in maintaining the logical flow of events.
3. Abrams and Johnson: Creating Lone Wolves
Both directors, J.J. Abrams and Rian Johnson, had something in common: they did not set out to make a trilogy but instead tackled each film as an independent entity. J.J. Abrams directed episodes 7, 8, and 9, while Rian Johnson directed 8 and 9, feeling that they were creating standalone films rather than parts of a larger story.
Why Were They 'One-Off'?
A Abrams' approach to the prequels (episodes I-III) emphasized spectacle and character development. His take on The Force Awakens lacked the depth and continuity of the original trilogy. Similarly, Rian Johnson's The Last Jedi and The Rise of Skywalker (end credits and theatrical versions) were less concerned with maintaining the same continuity and logical flow that the original trilogy and the prequels provided.
Conclusion
While Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker (2019) tried to cover up the plot holes with summation, the sequels overall often felt like individual works rather than a cohesive whole. Whether due to an overemphasis on visual spectacle or a lack of attention to story coherence, both Abrams and Johnson contributed to the sequence of films that have been criticized for their less than seamless narrative flow.