Scientology and the Legal System: Understanding Their Relationship
Understanding Scientology and the Legal Framework
Many individuals and organizations often assume that those within Scientology may believe they are above the law. However, this assumption is not universally applicable, especially among the general membership. In this article, we delve into the relationship between Scientology and the legal system, exploring the beliefs and practices within the organization as they relate to legal standards and ethical behavior.
Does Scientology Believe in Being Above the Law?
Officially, no, Scientology does not believe in being above the law. The Church of Scientology often emphasizes that its members are expected to abide by the laws of the land. If any member engages in illegal activities, they risk being expelled from the organization. This adherence to legal standards is a key aspect of Scientology's public relations and public image.
The Diverse Beliefs of Scientologists
However, the belief in being above the law is not a universal stance within Scientology. There is a range of beliefs among its members, reflecting the diversity within the organization. While the general membership understands the importance of following the law, higher-ups within the organization may have different ethical standards.
The Historical Context and Hubbard's Views
The history of Scientology includes instances where higher-ups believed in and occasionally practiced behaviors that were outside the legal frameworks. David L. Lawson, a senior Scientology figure, once indicated that while the organization as a whole is not above the law, certain individuals or groups within it may sometimes bend or break the law. This behavior was often justified by citing Hubbard's own beliefs and writings.
For instance, L. Ron Hubbard, the founder of Scientology, had complex views on the laws of the land. In his writings, he referred to "WOG" law as "aberrated," suggesting that Scientology could disregard or invalidate the legal system. He claimed that because Scientology was operating for "the greatest good," it was permissible to bend or break the law. This philosophy was adopted and sometimes employed by higher-ups within the organization as a means to protect the group or advance its interests.
Key Figures and Their Beliefs
The higher levels of Scientology management, particularly members of the Sea Org, consist of young and highly dedicated fanatics who often lack formal education. They have entered into a "billion year service agreement," binding them to Scientology across multiple lifetimes. Because of their extreme dedication and delusion, some individuals within these higher levels believe that laws only serve an unjust cause and that they do not need to abide by the law if it means protecting Scientology or covering up any issues.
Cases of Misconduct in Scientology
The organization's disregard for legal standards has resulted in several high-profile incidents. One of the most significant was the case of Lisa McPherson, a Scientologist whose death under the care of Scientology handlers became a defining moment for the organization. The death and subsequent legal troubles necessitated the "disappearance" of records, tampering with evidence, and even influencing the medical examiner's report. These actions were taken to protect Scientology from legal repercussions.
Operations like these have earned Scientology a reputation for bamboozling and manipulating legal systems. Lisa McPherson's case is one of many where Scientology has been accused of illegal behavior and unethical practices to maintain its control and secrecy.
In conclusion, while the general membership of Scientology adheres to legal standards, higher-ups within the organization have sometimes believed in and practiced behaviors that were outside the law. These actions have tarnished the organization's reputation and led to numerous legal challenges. Understanding the complex relationship between Scientology and the legal system is crucial for appreciating the organization's internal dynamics and its interactions with the broader legal landscape.