Introduction

Recently, Sarah Sanders has made headlines for admitting to lying, a behavior that appears to be a prerequisite in the Trump administration. This article will explore the implications of her admission, the broader context of lying in the administration, and the role of unreliable media in shaping public perception.

The Context of Lying in the Trump Administration

It is not a secret that the Trump administration is steeped in deception and misinformation. Many members of the cabinet, including Sarah Sanders herself, have been caught repeatedly lying in their capacities. Lying has become an accepted norm rather than an anomaly. Sanders’ admission, therefore, comes as no surprise to those aware of the administration's modus operandi.

Lying and Its Justification in the Administration

The justification for lying, according to many in the administration, is the pursuit of loyalty to the President. Truth is often disregarded in favor of maintaining a facade of loyalty and support. This attitude towards honesty is not a recent development but has been evident throughout the administration’s tenure. For instance, Jay Carney, a previous White House Press Secretary, was found to be dishonest when he talked about the IRS targeting scandal.

The Mueller Report and Sarah Sanders’ Admission

Despite the release of the redacted Mueller report, Sarah Sanders' admission to lying remains a significant event. While some may view it as a breakthrough in transparency, Sanders has a history of dishonesty. Since taking her position, she has been proven to be consistently untruthful. This pattern of behavior is not a sudden revelation but a consistent part of her character.

Public Trust and Propaganda

The continued faith in Sarah Sanders' honesty suggests a disturbing level of submission to propaganda. Those who still believe in Sanders' integrity are, in essence, accepting the narrative without critical analysis. The Mueller report, which many hoped would provide clarity, has not changed the picture significantly. The report, while providing insights, has not altered the core beliefs held by those who trust the administration.

Future Implications for Sarah Sanders

Given her track record and the administration’s need for loyalty, it is unlikely that Sarah Sanders will resign due to embarrassment. The question that arises is whether she can secure a more prestigious position within the administration, such as a seat on the Federal Reserve Board. Trump seems to value sycophancy and subservience over truthfulness, suggesting that a promotion would not be out of the question.

Evaluation of Medial Sources

The reliability of media sources is often questioned, especially in times of political turmoil. Sources like the Washington Post, MSNBC, CNN, and others are frequently accused of disseminating false information. It is crucial for the public to remain vigilant and discerning in evaluating claims made by these outlets. The trust in media must be scrutinized, and it is the responsibility of citizens to seek out multiple and reliable sources of information.

The Broader Picture

The admission of lying by Sarah Sanders is a manifestation of a larger issue in the Trump administration. Lying has become a standard practice to maintain loyalty to the administration. This behavior extends beyond individual political operatives and touches the very fabric of governance. The reliability of media sources is also under scrutiny as they are often seen as complicit in spreading misinformation.

The Role of Truth in Politics

Truth is a precious commodity in politics, often overshadowed by loyalty and personal allegiances. Critics argue that the focus on loyalty over truth fosters an environment where dishonesty is not only tolerated but encouraged. This trend is particularly worrying as it undermine the democratic principles that rely on accurate and transparent information.