Sage Steele’s Script Claim: A Potential Grim Omen for Biden Truthers?

Is it true that Sage Steele admitted her entire interview with Joe Biden was scripted? While some may find this claim shocking, others may argue it is a matter of business protocol. Let's delve into the details of this claim and its potential implications for Biden truthers.

Verifying the Claim

The claim comes from Sage Steele herself, an ESPN anchor who suggested that she was given a script and strictly adhered to it during her interview with Joe Biden. However, the veracity of this claim remains questionable given the lack of concrete evidence from a neutral third party.

The difficulty in verifying claims like these lies in the complex nature of media operations. It’s unlikely that either ESPN employees or the Biden White House would comment on such matters, especially given their vested interests.

History and Context

Sage Steele's history adds credibility to her claim. She was previously fired for being a "loose cannon," which means her bosses likely wanted to ensure that she wouldn't embarrass the network during a highly publicized event like an interview with the Vice President.

This history is reminiscent of Hillary Clinton's cautious approach to media appearances, where she often saw advance questions. It suggests that this practice might be more common in political spheres than many assume.

The contrast with Sarah Palin is particularly striking. Palin has long faced harsh media scrutiny, while other political figures like Obama have been afforded a less stringent approach. This disparity highlights the uneven application of media scrutiny.

Implications for Biden Truthers

The term "Biden truthers" refers to individuals who believe that President Joe Biden's rhetoric is deceptive or that there are hidden truths behind his public statements. If the claim that Steele was heavily scripted is true, it could impact how these truthers perceive Biden's interactions with the media.

Some may interpret this as a larger pattern of scripted responses from high-level politicians, providing fuel to those who believe the conversation with the public is controlled and not authentic. However, others might argue that this single instance doesn't necessarily reflect the entire administration's media strategy.

Analysis of the Claim

The most likely scenario is that ESPN, recognizing Steele's history of controversial remarks, decided to closely manage her during the interview. The comments from Steele herself, where she describes the experience as refreshingly honest, suggest that she may have felt restrained.

During her interview, Steele made some controversial statements, such as her belief that Barrack Obama 'isn’t really Black,' her views on vaccination protocols, and her opinions on sexual harassment in sports. Given her lack of sensitivity and competence, it's reasonable to assume that her bosses would have taken extra precautions to prevent another public relations disaster.

Media organizations often micromanage inexperienced or controversial anchors during high-profile interviews. This ensures that potentially damaging remarks are avoided, protecting the network's reputation.

Conclusion

The claim that Sage Steele’s interview with Joe Biden was heavily scripted remains unverified, but it adds another layer of complexity to the discussion around media representation and political discourse.

For Biden truthers, this could be a significant development. However, it's crucial to consider whether such an incident is representative of a larger trend or simply a one-off case. Only time will tell how much weight this claim will carry in shaping public perception.