Revisiting Peter Cushing in 'The Evil of Frankenstein' and 'The Curse of Frankenstein'

Many fans of the classic horror genre might not immediately think of Peter Cushing as the most sympathetic or likable character in the role of Baron Frankenstein. In fact, earlier in reviewing films like "The Curse of Frankenstein," a notable performance by Cushing was associated with a more menacing portrayal. However, upon closer examination, it becomes clear that Peter Cushing's performance in "The Evil of Frankenstein" unveils a tragic and more compassion-driven side to the character.

The Tragic Side of Baron Frankenstein

One of the most compelling aspects of 'The Evil of Frankenstein' is the emotional journey of Baron Frankenstein. This film delves into a more profound exploration of Frankenstein's psyche, particularly evident through Frankenstein's recollection of past events. The scene where he recounts his experiences is a poignant window into a more tragic aspect of his character. This portrayal is in stark contrast to the portrayal we see in 'The Curse of Frankenstein,' which focuses more on the darker and more ominous aspects of the character.

Comparing the Two Films: 'The Curse of Frankenstein' and 'The Evil of Frankenstein'

The visual and thematic differences between 'The Curse of Frankenstein' (1957) and 'The Evil of Frankenstein' (1966) are notable. In 'The Curse of Frankenstein,' Peter Cushing's Frankenstein is more overtly villainous, with a focus on the horror and the inevitable horror that befalls his creations. In contrast, 'The Evil of Frankenstein' provides a more nuanced and sympathetic exploration of Frankenstein's character, especially in the flashbacks that showcase his initial compassion towards the creature. Despite the differences, the films are interconnected, with 'The Curse of Frankenstein' establishing the basic premise, later to be explored and expanded in 'The Evil of Frankenstein'.

Character Interaction and Compassion

In 'The Evil of Frankenstein,' Peter Cushing's portrayal of Frankenstein includes moments of genuine care and concern for his creation, Kiwi Kingston. This compassion is particularly evident in the scenes where Frankenstein shares a more personal narrative about his past. This compassionate side of Frankenstein is in direct contrast to the portrayal in 'The Curse of Frankenstein,' where the emphasis is on the complex and tragic events that lead to the creation of the monster. The film's narrative structure allows for a deeper exploration of the character's psyche, revealing a more vulnerable and relatable side to Frankenstein.

The Other Villains and Peter Wolthorpe's Character

It's also important to note that in 'The Evil of Frankenstein,' the primary villain role goes to Peter Wolthorpe's character, Zoltan. Zoltan is the one who hijacks the creature and twists its purpose for evil. As a result, while Peter Cushing's Frankenstein does display more compassion, the film's focus on Zoltan's misdeeds keeps viewers engaged in a struggle between good and evil, adding to the film's overall tension and drama.

Conclusion

In conclusion, 'The Evil of Frankenstein' presents a fuller, more nuanced portrayal of Baron Frankenstein, with Peter Cushing's performance highlighting a more compassionate and sympathetic side to the character. The film's exploration of Frankenstein's past and his relationship with the creature serves as a powerful counterpoint to the earlier film's darker themes, enriching the audience's understanding of the character. Compelling performances and thought-provoking storytelling are hallmarks of these films, making them enduring entries in the classic horror genre.