Protecting Trump from Debates: Creative Excuses and Scenarios

As the political arena heats up, a looming debate between President Trump and former Vice President Joe Biden has been a topic of much speculation. While many eagerly anticipate the clash of ideas and policies on stage, the possibility of President Trump declining to participate presents its own set of challenges and opportunities. In this article, we explore various creative excuses and scenarios that could be used to avoid a face-to-face confrontation.

Struggling Against Controversial Opponents

While Kamala Harris, the Democratic nominee's running mate, has been criticized for her perceived lack of experience and intelligence, the idea of a debate with Biden is even more daunting for the incumbent. Debating Biden would not only be a challenge in terms of policy and substance but also a potential public relations disaster for the Trump campaign. Therefore, the Trump team is considering all possibilities to avoid these debates.

One such idea is that Biden should have avoided the debate altogether. The suggestion is that he should "go into a nursing home" - a somewhat conspiratorial and slanderous remark that disregards physical and mental health as excuses. Further, the assertion that "What DOCTOR Jill is doing to him is elder abuse" is an assault on both the vice president-elect and his wife, a highly unprofessional and damaging statement.

Health and Dementia Claims

Another excuse that could be employed is the idea of health issues, specifically dementia. The proposal suggests that due to the "big guy" letting him down at the debate, Biden may have dementia which is expected to "continue to get worse." Such an excuse, if used effectively, could diminish Biden's credibility and detract from his campaign promises.

Moreover, the argument that Biden might claim to need more time to prepare could be another useful strategy. The idea is that he could "need another week to prepare for every 90 minutes of his term," leading him to request an excessive amount of time, which might be hard for the Trump team to refute but could create additional delays.

Campaign Red Herrings and Legal Pretexts

One of the more creative yet concerning approaches is using legal and health pretexts to avoid the debate. The possibility of a sudden sickness or acute medical condition is one factor that could be leveraged. Another is the idea of an arrest that could either make him unable to participate or could be used as a campaign strategy to raise support through claims of deep state oppression.

A more sophisticated tactic would be to cite legal advice and court rulings. A statement such as, 'My lawyers have advised me not to participate in this debate still being under a partial gag order from Judge Mercan. Since my entire right to free speech is being denied, I will not participate in the debate,' could be seen as a legitimate legal argument and could generate significant support among Trump's base, particularly if announced on platforms like CNN.

Conclusion

The avoidance of political debates by any candidate can have major implications for their campaign. From health claims to legal excuses, the strategies to sidestep a debate need to be carefully crafted and executed. As the debate continues to loom, it will be interesting to see how both sides navigate these challenges and navigate the complex terrain of political campaigning.

Keywords: presidential debates, Trump excuses, political debate strategies