Pros and Cons of Built-in Manual Safety on Semi-automatic Pistols

When it comes to semi-automatic pistols, the inclusion of a built-in manual safety can significantly impact their functionality and safety. This article delves into the pros and cons of having a manual safety, providing insights from the perspective of a skilled user who trains with concealed carry guns regularly.

Pros of Built-in Manual Safety

The primary advantage of a built-in manual safety is its safety feature. Safe operation is paramount, especially with firearms, and a manual safety adds an extra layer of security. In scenarios such as appendix carry, where the firearm is kept on one's body, a manual safety is often recommended. This recommendation is based on the clear and obvious safety concerns it offers.

Cons of Built-in Manual Safety

While a manual safety is a valuable safety feature, it can also introduce some drawbacks. One of the most significant cons is the potential to slow down the user. Training with concealed carry guns regularly, as I do, has taught me that the stress of real-life situations and the combination of fatigue and adrenaline can make it easier to misoperate the safety. This can be particularly problematic when one's life depends on the firearm being ready to use in a split second.

Training and Stress

Regular stress training has shown me that while physical and mental stress can be significant, the critical stress that can arise during a dangerous situation is vastly different. Under intense and unexpected stress, there is a higher likelihood of stumbling or fumbling, including misoperating the safety. As a result, in my conceal carry guns and most of my competition guns (excluding M1911s), I prefer to have a manual safety that is nothing more than an integrated trigger safety.

Gun-Specific Examples

Let's consider specific gun models to further illustrate these points. The Colt M1911 is a notable example where the manual safety, when well-designed, can serve as an advantage. The safety on the M1911 is well-placed, allowing for a convenient grip that is ideal. I can move from a safe and holstered weapon into a ready-to-rock position with ease. Unless I'm in a competition without optics, I start my competition runs in Condition One and flip the safety down as I draw, transitioning to a low thumb grip as I get on target. The process is seamless and can be executed efficiently, whether or not I'm under threat.

On the other hand, the Beretta 92F presents a more challenging situation. This firearm was once known as the M9, and it has a distinct set of drawbacks when it comes to carrying it as a concealed carry (CC) pistol. For individuals with smaller hands, like myself, the double-action trigger makes it difficult to conceal the weapon effectively. Additionally, due to the use of a pin block hammer drop decocker safety, it cannot be carried in Condition One. Furthermore, the safety's awkward placement for a high thumb grip and the necessity to pull back the hammer for every use make it less than ideal for rapid deployment.

In conclusion, while a built-in manual safety can enhance the safety of a firearm, it is essential to consider its impact on functionality, especially in high-pressure situations. The decision to include or exclude a manual safety on a semi-automatic pistol should weigh these pros and cons carefully.